Free AI Visibility Audit
Is your website visible to AI?
AI assistants like ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity answer billions of queries. Most websites are invisible to them. Find out where yours stands — in 60 seconds.
100
the whole scale
- AI Share of Voice20
- Retrieval Readiness16
- Search Presence (Google/Bing)14
- AI Identity & Crawlability14
- Technical & Performance12
- AI Sentiment8
- Mention Position8
- Competitor Gap8
Files an AI reads first
- llms.txt
- ai.json
- ai.txt
- identity.json
- llm.txt
- llms.html
- brand.txt
- developer-ai.txt
- faq-ai.txt
- robots-ai.txt
- robots.txt
Our own site
The same audit, run on us
We sell this measurement, so it runs on inite.ai too: the same pipeline, the same weekly schedule, the same frozen prompt set that makes two readings comparable at all. The card is whatever the last run returned, including the runs that returned nothing.
45/100
AI Visibility Score
Share of voice
0%
answered prompts: 20
prompts: 20 · runs: 7 · engines: 2
- AI Share of Voice0/20
- Retrieval Readiness12/16
- Search Presence (Google/Bing)not measured
- AI Identity & Crawlability13/14
- Technical & Performancenot measured
- AI Sentimentnot measured
- Mention Positionnot measured
- Competitor Gap1/8
- 01AI Citation AuditTest what AI models say about your brand in real queries
- 02AI Identity Filesai.json, llms.txt, robots.txt — signals AI assistants read first
- 03AI Crawler PolicyAre GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Perplexity allowed to index your site?
- 04Schema.org MarkupStructured data that helps AI understand your business
- 05Technical SEOCanonical URL, hreflang, meta description completeness
- 06Open Graph TagsMetadata for AI sharing and social previews
- 07Performance & SEOCore Web Vitals, Lighthouse scores, mobile readiness
- 08Market IntelligencePain points and decision criteria from real user discussions
- 09Action PlanPrioritized recommendations with quick wins and strategy
What the run actually does
Six stages, in the order they happen. It is the same list the progress panel shows while a run is in flight, standing still so you can read it before starting one.
- 01
Fetch
Your page, then a sample of the site
What a crawler would actually get
- 02
Read
Business summary, schema graph, meta tags
Who the site says it is
- 03
Reach
Identity files, crawler policy, performance
Whether an engine can retrieve it at all
- 04
Ask
Live prompts across the answer engines, with web search and without
Who gets named, and how often
- 05
Score
Eight weighted sections, measured ones only
The reading, and how much of it was measured
- 06
Fix
Action plan, schema, llms.txt, outreach
Full run only — the free preview stops at the scoreFiles to paste, not advice to read
What an AI visibility audit checksand what a low score is actually pointing at
An assistant answering a question about your category does three things before it can name you: it has to be allowed to fetch your site, it has to work out which company that site belongs to, and it has to find something on a page worth quoting. Fail any of the three and you are absent from the answer, however well the page ranks in a search box.
This audit reads your live site the way those assistants do — the robots policy first, then the identity files, the schema graph and the pages themselves — and reports each separately, so a low score points at a cause rather than a mood.
25/100
decided by seven bots
These decide whether you turn up in an answer at all. Together they carry 25 points of the score.
- Bingbot6
- OAI-SearchBot5
- PerplexityBot4
- ChatGPT-User3
- Claude-SearchBot3
- Perplexity-User2
- Claude-User2
Block these and your visibility does not move, whatever the checklists advise.
- GPTBot
- ClaudeBot
- Google-Extended
- CCBot
- Applebot-Extended
- Meta-ExternalAgent
- Bytespider
- Amazonbot
What it cannot tell youand where the rest of the answer comes from
Being named in AI answers is driven mostly by what other sites say about you, and this scan reads only yours. It establishes what a fetch of your homepage, your robots.txt and your identity files can establish. Off-site mentions and pages outside that read need a full audit, and no free tool claiming otherwise is measuring them either.
- Claude
- ChatGPT
- Gemini
- Perplexity
one run
4
named you
2
cited your site
Two of them answer only the first question: they do not hand back the URLs they used. Counting that as a zero would pass a measurement failure off as a result.
Questions
- What is an AI visibility audit?
- A check of whether AI assistants can reach, identify and quote your website. It is a different question from search ranking: a page can sit first in Google and still be invisible to an assistant that robots.txt blocks, or that cannot resolve which company the site belongs to.
- What does this audit check?
- Crawler policy for GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot; the AI identity files, ai.json and llms.txt; the Schema.org graph; canonical and hreflang; Open Graph; Core Web Vitals; and a citation test that asks live models what they say about your brand.
- How long does it take, and what does it cost?
- About sixty seconds, and nothing. Two runs a day need no card and no account, and the report is on screen when it finishes.
- What do I do with the result?
- Every finding names the file or the page it came from, so most are a change your own team can make in an afternoon. Where the work is larger — a schema graph to rebuild, pages an engine cannot retrieve — that is what the visibility engagement is for.
If you would rather it were fixedthe plan stays yours either way
The audit says where you stand. The engagement is the work that moves it.
Run it yourself
- Most findings are an afternoon for whoever owns the site, because the report says which file to open
- The crawler policy is the one to check twice: what robots.txt allows and what the CDN does to the request are different questions
- The schema graph and the identity files have to agree with each other, or the entity reads as two companies
- Pages that only exist after the browser runs are a rendering decision, not a copy one
- Then measure again on the same prompt set, because a repair nobody re-measured is an opinion
Have it done
- The same repairs, inside one to two weeks rather than between other work
- Opening and closing audits on the same checks, so anything we claim to have changed is a number visible on both
- Nothing in the plan is withheld if you read it and decide to do it yourself
- Fee
- $1,500
- Length
- 1–2wks
Re-audited at the end against the same checks, so the change is measured rather than claimed.
See the visibility engagement