Skip to content
agentleFS logo

agentleFS

Gives Claude Code, Cursor and Codex read and write access to shared team folders, limited to what each person may see, with versioned writes.

At a glanceswept 2026-10-12

≈ 5visits/mo

Little sign of use · estimate, read 2026-10-12

  • agentleFS5
  • #1 Microsoft135M
  • Developer tools median25
Price
Price not read
Activity
Actively maintainedrelease 2 days ago · site updated 2 days ago
Company
founding year not on record
Runs as
API
Your datawhat they publish, each line with its page · read 2026-10-14

“We do not use your content to train or improve AI models.”

privacy policy ↗

These are agentleFS's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.

How a program reaches itfound, not claimed · read 2026-10-14
  • MCP servercom.agentlefs/agentlefsverified in the MCP registry
  • Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-14
  • Address to connectmcp.agentlefs.com/mcp

MCP server details →

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

Alternatives in Developer toolsby use, among tools still maintained

Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since

All Developer tools tools →

Questions this page answers
  • What is agentleFS?

    Gives Claude Code, Cursor and Codex read and write access to shared team folders, limited to what each person may see, with versioned writes. It is listed in the Atlas under Developer tools.

  • Do people use agentleFS?

    Little sign of use: ≈ 5 visits/mo · estimate, 2026-10.

  • Is agentleFS still maintained?

    Actively maintained: release 2 days ago · site updated 2 days ago.

  • Does agentleFS train AI on your data?

    No, per its privacy policy (2026-10-14): “We do not use your content to train or improve AI models.”

  • Is agentleFS safe?

    We do not audit vendors. What agentleFS publishes, read 2026-10-14: on training with your data, “We do not use your content to train or improve AI models.”.

  • What are alternatives to agentleFS?

    In Developer tools, by use: Coddy, God of Prompt, T3 Code, One, CapitaWork, Clor.

Not quite it? Describe the job

beta

Five tools from the Atlas that fit it, each judged against what you wrote.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.