Base44
Generates fully functional apps, websites, and AI agents from plain language descriptions without coding.
≈ 253kvisits/mo
Widely used · estimate, read 2026-09-19
- Price
- Free plan · From $16/mopricing page, read 2026-09-20
- Activity
- Actively maintainednothing dated on the site
- Company
- since 2024per Wikidata
- Runs as
- No-code
- build fully functional apps from plain language descriptions
- integrate with daily tools like Gmail, Slack, and Salesforce
- export source code to GitHub and own the built applications
- #4
PostHog
Ingests product data and runs AI agents to investigate issues and recommend product improvements.
24.7knot readFree plan2020 - #7
Framer
Design and build websites with AI agents that generate, refine, and manage content directly on canvas.
245knot readFrom $10/mo - #16
Kiro
Converts prompts into executable specifications and implements code with parallel agents that validate correctness.
32.7kActiveFrom $20/user/mo - #21
Devin
Executes software engineering tasks including code migrations, bug fixes, testing, and documentation generation across multiple repositories.
30.6kActiveFrom $20/mo - #27
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)
Runs automated tests on web and mobile applications using AI agents across browsers, devices, and environments at scale.
370kActiveFrom $17/mo2017 - #34
Replit
Builds and deploys web apps, websites, and agents from natural language descriptions.
278knot readFrom $20/mo
- Founded2024-10-01per Wikidata
- HeadquartersTel Avivper Wikidata
- Industryno code developmentper Wikidata
What is Base44?
Generates fully functional apps, websites, and AI agents from plain language descriptions without coding.
How much does Base44 cost?
Base44 has a free plan; paid plans start at $16/mo, per its pricing page on 2026-09-20.
Do people use Base44?
Widely used: ≈ 253k visits a month · estimate, 2026-09.
Is Base44 still maintained?
Actively maintained.
What are alternatives to Base44?
In Developer tools, by use: PostHog, Framer, Kiro, Devin, TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest), Replit.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one row at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.