
Arbiter
Maintained
- Is it safe? Run by Bono Network Corp. Its policy says it does not train on your data.See ↓
- Is it free? We have not read the prices of Arbiter yet; they are next in our queue. Until then, the official site has them.bono.network ↗
- What else does this?
Thomson Reuters Checkpoint Edge with CoCounsel AI
Harvey
LegesGPTfreeSee ↓
≈ 19visits/mo
Emerging · estimate, read Sep 20, 2026
- Activity
- Maintainedrelease 2 years ago · site updated 8 weeks ago
- Company
- Bono Network Corp · Domain since 2024privacy policy · domain registered
- How it runs
- API
- Used for
- analyze contracts for risks and compliance issues
- research legal questions across global jurisdictions
- generate jurisdiction-aware legal documents and contracts
- On the web since 2024, older than 73% of its shelfINITE Atlas
- Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsbono.network ↗
- Launched on Product Hunt on Mar 10, 2025Product Hunt ↗
- Run byBono Network Corpprivacy policy ↗
- Trains on your dataNosecurity page ↗
- Certifications they stateSOC 2 Type II · HIPAA · GDPR · CCPAsecurity page ↗
- Trust centertheir owntrust center ↗
- Privacy policy updated2025-05-03privacy policy ↗
- Security contactsecurity.txt
“Your data is never shared with third parties or used to train AI models without your explicit consent.”
security page ↗
These are Arbiter's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.
- API docsplatform.bono.networkthe vendor's page ↗
- Status pagelinked from the homepagestatus.bono.network ↗
This card as JSON, for your agent →
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1

Thomson Reuters Checkpoint Edge with CoCounsel AI
Integrates legal research, analysis and drafting with AI grounded in legal content and case law.
3MActive2008 - #2

Harvey
Executes legal work including document analysis, contract review, due diligence, and litigation support using language models.
65.3kActive2022 - #3

LegesGPT
Answers legal questions with verified citations, reviews contracts for risks, and generates custom legal documents.
4.3kActiveFrom $19.99/mo - #4

TheLawGPTMCP · sign-in
Analyzes legal documents and answers jurisdiction-specific legal questions with citations to verified sources.
2.3kActiveFrom $19.99/user/mo2024 - #5

Legal Sparrow
Analyzes legal documents and answers questions with verified citations across Pakistani and UK case law.
5ActiveFree plan
Not it? Say what you need
betaThree tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.
No notes yet. What do you use Arbiter for?
Sign in to leave a noteWhat is Arbiter?
Analyzes contracts and conducts legal research across jurisdictions with risk assessment and citations. It is listed in the Atlas under Legal and made by Bono Network Corp.
Do people use Arbiter?
Emerging: ≈ 19 visits/mo · estimate, 2026-09.
Is Arbiter still maintained?
Maintained: release 2 years ago · site updated 8 weeks ago.
Who owns Arbiter?
Arbiter is run by Bono Network Corp, per its privacy policy (2026-10-10).
Does Arbiter train AI on your data?
No, per its security page (2026-10-10): “Your data is never shared with third parties or used to train AI models without your explicit consent.”
Is Arbiter safe?
We do not audit vendors. What Arbiter publishes, read 2026-10-10: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA stated on its security page; on training with your data, “Your data is never shared with third parties or used to train AI models without your explicit consent.”.
Is Arbiter HIPAA compliant?
Arbiter states HIPAA compliance on its security page (2026-10-10). We have not verified it.
What are alternatives to Arbiter?
In Legal, by use: Thomson Reuters Checkpoint Edge with CoCounsel AI, Harvey, LegesGPT, TheLawGPT, Legal Sparrow.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.
How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.