Skip to content
Buska logo

Buska

Scans 30 platforms for public posts showing buying intent, scores them and drafts replies for sales teams.

From $49/moActively maintained

At a glanceswept Oct 14, 2026

≈ 242visits/mo

Little sign of use · estimate, read Oct 14, 2026

For
B2B founders and sales or growth teams finding buyers in public social posts
Activity
Actively maintainedsite updated 11 days ago
Company
Fibroweb SAS · since 2023terms of service · per their site
Runs as
API
Used for
  • find people posting about a problem your product solves
  • flag posts where people ask for a tool recommendation
  • draft replies to prospects in your own voice
read off buska.io on Oct 18, 2026
Worth knowingcomputed from what we read · each with its source
  • Used more than 72% of the 1,268 tools on its shelfINITE Atlas →
  • On the web since 2023, older than 78% of its shelfINITE Atlas
  • Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
  • Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsbuska.io ↗
Pricingpricing page, read Oct 18, 2026

From $49/mo

Trial & discounts 7-day free trial

The companyeach fact with its source · read Oct 18, 2026
Your datawhat they publish, each line with its page · read Oct 18, 2026

These are Buska's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.

How a program reaches itfound, not claimed · read Oct 18, 2026
  • MCP serverio.buska/buskaverified in the MCP registry
  • Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-18
  • Address to connectapi.buska.io/mcp
  • OpenAPI spec4 pathsthe spec ↗
  • MCP docsbuska.io/mcpthe vendor's page ↗

MCP server details →

This card as JSON, for your agent →

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

Alternatives in Marketingby use, among tools still maintained

Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since

Compare Buska with

Pick up to two.

All 10 alternatives to Buska →

All Marketing tools →

Not it? Say what you need

beta

Three tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.

From people who use itnot part of the reading

No notes yet. What do you use Buska for?

Sign in to leave a note
Questions this page answers
  • What is Buska?

    Scans 30 platforms for public posts showing buying intent, scores them and drafts replies for sales teams. It is listed in the Atlas under Marketing and made by Fibroweb SAS.

  • Who is Buska for?

    B2B founders and sales or growth teams finding buyers in public social posts

  • How much does Buska cost?

    Paid plans start at $49/mo, per Buska's pricing page on 2026-10-18.

  • Is Buska free?

    No. Its pricing page showed no free plan on 2026-10-18.

  • Do people use Buska?

    Little sign of use: ≈ 242 visits/mo · estimate, 2026-10.

  • Is Buska still maintained?

    Actively maintained: site updated 11 days ago.

  • Who owns Buska?

    Buska is run by Fibroweb SAS, per its terms of service (2026-10-18).

  • Is Buska safe?

    We do not audit vendors. What Buska publishes, read 2026-10-18: SOC 2 Type II, GDPR stated on its privacy policy.

  • Does Buska have a free trial?

    Yes, a 7-day free trial, per its pricing page (2026-10-18).

  • How do I cancel Buska?

    In its own words (pricing page, 2026-10-18): “You can cancel your subscription at any time from your account settings.”

  • Does Buska give refunds?

    In its own words (terms of service, 2026-10-18): “Once a paid subscription is activated, the amount paid for the current billing period is non-refundable, regardless of the plan selected (Starter, Growth, Scale, or Agency) and regardless of actual usage.”

  • What are alternatives to Buska?

    In Marketing, by use: Zebracat, Nuelink, Faceless.so, Overvisual, Pressmaster.ai V4, Engain.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.