Caveman
Reduces AI agent token costs through model routing, auto-caching, prompt compression, and waste detection.
≈ 9.6kvisits/mo
Established · estimate, read 2026-09-18
- For
- AI teams and developers reducing token costs and compute expenses for LLMs.
- Price
- Contact salespricing page, read 2026-09-19
- Activity
- Actively maintainednothing dated on the site
- Company
- founding year not on record
- Runs as
- API
- detect and fix repeated tool calls in agent traces
- automatically cache prompts and compress context
- route requests to cheapest models maintaining quality
- #18
Kiro
Converts prompts into executable specifications and implements code with parallel agents that validate correctness.
32.7kActiveFrom $20/user/mo - #25
Devin
Executes software engineering tasks including code migrations, bug fixes, testing, and documentation generation across multiple repositories.
30.6kActiveFrom $20/mo - #26
Remy prompt
Builds websites, designs slides, and generates images through conversational AI.
30.9knot read— - #33
Nous Research
Trains and releases open source language models with infrastructure for distributed training.
33.7knot read— - #38
Replit
Builds and deploys web apps, websites, and agents from natural language descriptions.
278knot readFrom $20/mo - #40
Lovable
Builds production-grade web and mobile applications from natural language descriptions.
198knot readFree plan2023
What is Caveman?
Reduces AI agent token costs through model routing, auto-caching, prompt compression, and waste detection.
Who is Caveman for?
AI teams and developers reducing token costs and compute expenses for LLMs.
How much does Caveman cost?
Caveman does not publish prices; its pricing page says to contact sales (2026-09-19).
Do people use Caveman?
Established: ≈ 9.6k visits a month · estimate, 2026-09 · 96.1k npm installs a month.
Is Caveman still maintained?
Actively maintained.
What are alternatives to Caveman?
In Developer tools, by use: Kiro, Devin, Remy prompt, Nous Research, Replit, Lovable.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one row at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.