Skip to content
Baton logo

Baton

Runs multiple coding agents in parallel within isolated git worktrees with unified monitoring and control.

Developer toolsDesktop appFor developersAgents
getbaton.dev ↗Product HuntLaunched on Product Hunt · 2026-04-01
At a glanceswept 2026-09-19
Price
Price not read
Use
Emerging≈ 10 visits a month · estimate, 2026-09
Activity
Maintainednothing dated on the site
Company
founding year not on record
Runs as
Desktop app
Alternatives in Developer toolsby use, among tools still maintained
  • TwilioSends and receives SMS, email, and voice messages through APIs and manages customer conversations with AI.

    Widely usedActively maintained

    ≈ 1.1M visits/mo
  • PostHogIngests product data and runs AI agents to investigate issues and recommend product improvements.

    Widely used

    ≈ 24.7k visits/mo
  • KiroConverts prompts into executable specifications and implements code with parallel agents that validate correctness.

    Widely usedActively maintained

    ≈ 32.7k visits/mo
  • DevinExecutes software engineering tasks including code migrations, bug fixes, testing, and documentation generation across multiple repositories.

    Widely usedActively maintained

    ≈ 30.6k visits/mo
  • TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)Runs automated tests on web and mobile applications using AI agents across browsers, devices, and environments at scale.

    Widely usedActively maintained

    ≈ 370k visits/mo
  • ReplitBuilds and deploys web apps, websites, and agents from natural language descriptions.

    Widely used

    ≈ 278k visits/mo

All Developer tools tools →

Questions this page answers
  • What is Baton?

    Runs multiple coding agents in parallel within isolated git worktrees with unified monitoring and control.

  • Do people use Baton?

    Emerging: ≈ 10 visits a month · estimate, 2026-09.

  • Is Baton still maintained?

    Maintained.

  • What are alternatives to Baton?

    In Developer tools, by use: Twilio, PostHog, Kiro, Devin, TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest), Replit.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one row at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.