Skip to content
Minds logo

Minds

Generates synthetic audiences from a brief and runs simulated surveys and A/B concept tests against them.

Actively maintained

At a glanceswept Oct 21, 2026

≈ 596visits/mo

Little sign of use · estimate, read Oct 12, 2026

For
Marketing and product teams testing messages, concepts and campaigns against simulated audiences before launch
Activity
Actively maintainedrelease 3 days ago · site updated 2 days ago
Company
since 2024per their site
Used for
  • score how strongly a video stops scrolling
  • compare product preferences across distinct audience segments
  • run A/B tests on competing packaging visuals
Worth knowingcomputed from what we read · each with its source
  • Used more than 81% of the 1,465 tools on its shelfINITE Atlas →
  • On the web since 2024, older than 67% of its shelfINITE Atlas
  • Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
  • Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsgetminds.ai ↗
Pricing

Price not read

The companyeach fact with its source · read Oct 17, 2026
Your datawhat they publish, each line with its page · read Oct 17, 2026

“According to Vercel, the gateway does not use prompts or outputs for model training and does not retain them after a request is completed.”

privacy policy ↗

These are Minds's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.

How a program reaches itfound, not claimed · read Oct 17, 2026
  • MCP serverai.getminds/mindsverified in the MCP registry
  • Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-17
  • Address to connectgetminds.ai/mcp
  • OpenAPI spec122 pathsthe spec ↗
  • API docsgetminds.ai/docs/api/overviewthe vendor's page ↗
  • MCP docsgetminds.ai/mcp/overviewthe vendor's page ↗

MCP server details →

This card as JSON, for your agent →

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

Alternatives in Marketingby use, among tools still maintained

Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since

Compare Minds with

Pick up to two.

All 10 alternatives to Minds →

All Marketing tools →

Not it? Say what you need

beta

Three tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.

From people who use itnot part of the reading

No notes yet. What do you use Minds for?

Sign in to leave a note
Questions this page answers
  • What is Minds?

    Generates synthetic audiences from a brief and runs simulated surveys and A/B concept tests against them. It is listed in the Atlas under Marketing.

  • Who is Minds for?

    Marketing and product teams testing messages, concepts and campaigns against simulated audiences before launch

  • Do people use Minds?

    Little sign of use: ≈ 596 visits/mo · estimate, 2026-10.

  • Is Minds still maintained?

    Actively maintained: release 3 days ago · site updated 2 days ago.

  • Does Minds train AI on your data?

    No, per its privacy policy (2026-10-17): “According to Vercel, the gateway does not use prompts or outputs for model training and does not retain them after a request is completed.”

  • Is Minds safe?

    We do not audit vendors. What Minds publishes, read 2026-10-17: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR stated on its DPA; on training with your data, “According to Vercel, the gateway does not use prompts or outputs for model training and does not retain them after a request is completed.”.

  • Does Minds give refunds?

    In its own words (terms of service, 2026-10-17): “If a material adverse change must take effect during a paid term and is not required by law or necessary to address an urgent security risk, the Customer may terminate the affected service before the change takes effect and receive a pro-rata refund of prepaid fees for the unused period.”

  • What are alternatives to Minds?

    In Marketing, by use: Synthetic People AI, Lumina, neuroflash, PickFu, Signa, BuyerTwin.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.

How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk