Orbit
Drives installed coding assistants on separate git branches per task, logging each run's actions for later review.
not read yet
Use
- For
- developers who run coding agents like Claude Code on their own repositories
- Price
- Price not read
- Activity
- Actively maintainedsite updated 5 weeks ago
- Company
- founding year not on record
- Runs as
- CLI
- run several coding agent tasks side by side in separate worktrees
- review what each agent changed and why
- split one change across backend and frontend repositories
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1
Cursor
AI coding agent that writes code, runs tasks, and reviews pull requests autonomously or with human direction.
314kActiveFrom $20/user/mo2023 - #2
Warp
Runs fleets of coding agents across software development workflows defined in code.
162kActiveFrom $20/mo - #3
Augment Code
Orchestrates software development agents across the full lifecycle from tickets to deployment and monitoring.
144kActiveFrom $20/mo - #4
Continue (Mission Control)
Open-source coding agent that assists developers with code generation and refactoring tasks.
91.9kActiveOpen source - #5
Devin
Executes software engineering tasks including code migrations, bug fixes, testing, and documentation generation across multiple repositories.
30.6kActiveFrom $20/mo - #6
Kilo
Provides AI coding agents that run in IDEs, CLIs, and cloud environments with open-source infrastructure and transparent model routing.
16.8kActiveFrom $15/user/mo2025
What is Orbit?
Drives installed coding assistants on separate git branches per task, logging each run's actions for later review. It is listed in the Atlas under Developer tools.
Who is Orbit for?
developers who run coding agents like Claude Code on their own repositories
Do people use Orbit?
Little sign of use.
Is Orbit still maintained?
Actively maintained: site updated 5 weeks ago.
What are alternatives to Orbit?
In Developer tools, by use: Cursor, Warp, Augment Code, Continue (Mission Control), Devin, Kilo.
Not quite it? Describe the job
betaFive tools from the Atlas that fit it, each judged against what you wrote.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.