Skip to content

Glyt

Issues offline-checkable receipts that prove a named human operator approved a specific agent action.
AgentsSecurity
glyt.net ↗
Open glyt.netAlternativesSet it up for my team
Glyt: data, price, alternatives
  • Is it safe? We have not read the data policy of Glyt yet. Read it on the official site before you upload anything.glyt.net ↗
  • Is it free? We have not read the prices of Glyt yet; they are next in our queue. Until then, the official site has them.glyt.net ↗
  • What else does this? We have not measured alternatives for this one yet. If you know one, add it below.See ↓
At a glancechecked Oct 26, 2026

not read yet

Use

For
Teams running AI agents that take consequential actions and need proof a human approved them.
Used for
  • Get a named human to approve a specific agent action
  • Attach an offline-checkable approval receipt to an action
  • Have a downstream service refuse actions lacking recent approval
Worth knowingcomputed from what we read · each with its source
  • Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
  • Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsglyt.net ↗
How a program reaches itfound, not claimed · read Oct 26, 2026
  • MCP servernet.glyt/glytverified in the MCP registry
  • Stateanswers, 6 toolschecked 2026-10-26
  • Address to connectglyt.net/mcp
  • OpenAPI spec6 pathsthe spec ↗

MCP server details →

This card as JSON, for your agent →

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

Not it? Say what you need

beta

Three tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.

From people who use itnot part of the reading

No notes yet. What do you use Glyt for?

Sign in to leave a note
Questions this page answers
  • What is Glyt?

    Issues offline-checkable receipts that prove a named human operator approved a specific agent action.

  • Who is Glyt for?

    Teams running AI agents that take consequential actions and need proof a human approved them.

  • Do people use Glyt?

    Little sign of use.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.

How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk