Skip to content
Intellegal logo

Intellegal

Searches Philippine case law and statutes, traces citations to primary sources, and reviews contracts against Philippine law.

LegalSearchComplianceNo-code
intellegal.ai ↗YouTubeXFacebookLinkedInWikidataLaunched on Product Hunt · 2026-08-20
At a glanceswept 2026-09-17
Price
Price not read
Use
Emerging≈ 10 visits a month · estimate, 2026-09
Activity
Actively maintainednothing dated on the site
Company
since 2026first launch
Runs as
No-code
Alternatives in Legalby use, among tools still maintained
  • IroncladManages contract lifecycle from creation through execution and analysis with AI-assisted review and negotiation.Widely usedActivity not read yet
  • HarveyExecutes legal work including document analysis, contract review, due diligence, and litigation support using language models.EstablishedActivity not read yet
  • LuminanceAutomates contract drafting, negotiation, analysis, compliance monitoring, and investigation using legal-grade AI agents.EstablishedActivity not read yet
  • SpellbookReviews and drafts contracts, flags risks, and stores signed agreements for search and analysis.EstablishedActivity not read yet
  • LawGeexAutomatically reviews and redlines contracts according to company policies using machine learning.EstablishedActivity not read yet
  • EvisortManages contract data and provides contract intelligence for legal operations.EstablishedActivity not read yet

All Legal tools →

The companyeach fact with its source · read 2026-09-17
  • Industryartificial intelligenceper Wikidata
Questions this page answers
  • What is Intellegal?

    Searches Philippine case law and statutes, traces citations to primary sources, and reviews contracts against Philippine law.

  • Do people use Intellegal?

    Emerging: ≈ 10 visits a month · estimate, 2026-09.

  • Is Intellegal still maintained?

    Actively maintained.

  • What are alternatives to Intellegal?

    In Legal, by use: Ironclad, Harvey, Luminance, Spellbook, LawGeex, Evisort.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one row at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.