
IronShard
From $0.02/moActively maintained
not read yet
Use
- For
- teams running AI agents that need governed, auditable S3 storage over MCP
- Price
- From $0.02/mopricing page, read Oct 23, 2026
- Activity
- Actively maintainedrelease 3 weeks ago · site updated 6 days ago
- Company
- Chocolate Cloud ApS · Domain since 2025site footer · domain registered
- Runs as
- API
- Used for
- branch production data so agents can experiment without touching it
- roll storage back to an earlier point in time
- look up every file an AI agent touched in the audit log
- Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
- Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsironshard.ai ↗
From $0.02/mo
- Domain since2025domain registered
- Raised€2Mper their About page ↗
- HeadquartersAarhus, Denmarkper their About page
- Run byChocolate Cloud ApSsite footer ↗
- Certifications they stateSOC 2 Type II · ISO 27001 · HIPAA · GDPR · ISO 27701 · PCI DSS · CSA STARtrust center ↗
- Trust centertheir owntrust center ↗
These are IronShard's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.
- MCP serverai.ironshard/agent-storage-sandboxverified in the MCP registry
- Stateanswers, 8 toolschecked 2026-10-23
- Address to connectagents-mcp.ironshard.ai/mcp
- MCP docsironshard.ai/docs/connect-claudethe vendor's page ↗
This card as JSON, for your agent →
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1

EgnyteMCP · sign-in
Stores and syncs company files in a cloud repository with co-editing, permission controls, and AI search and agents that run over those files.
227kActiveFrom $22/user/mo2007 - #2

New RelicMCP · sign-in
Collects application, infrastructure, log and digital experience telemetry, then flags anomalies, cloud costs and security risks for engineers to investigate.
76.1kActiveFrom $10/user/mo2008 - #3

RailwayMCP · sign-in
Deploys repositories and Dockerfiles as cloud services, auto-detecting build settings, with per-PR preview environments, scaling, and built-in logs and metrics.
60.5kActiveFrom $5/mo2020 - #4

Blink
Provisions self-hosted cloud development workspaces from Terraform templates on your own infrastructure, with access controls, and can run coding agents in them.
50.5kActiveFree plan2017 - #5

Merge
Provides one unified API for HR, payroll, ATS, CRM, accounting and file-storage integrations, plus authenticated tool access for AI agents.
35.1kActiveFrom $650/mo2020 - #6

Open WebUI
Self-hosted web interface for running AI models locally with data residency and access control.
25.2kActiveFree plan
Not it? Say what you need
betaThree tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.
No notes yet. What do you use IronShard for?
Sign in to leave a noteWhat is IronShard?
Provides S3-compatible cloud buckets that AI agents access over MCP, with branching, per-agent access control and a signed audit log. It is listed in the Atlas under Developer tools and made by Chocolate Cloud ApS.
Who is IronShard for?
teams running AI agents that need governed, auditable S3 storage over MCP
How much does IronShard cost?
Paid plans start at $0.02/mo, per IronShard's pricing page on 2026-10-23.
Do people use IronShard?
Little sign of use.
Is IronShard still maintained?
Actively maintained: release 3 weeks ago · site updated 6 days ago.
Who owns IronShard?
IronShard is run by Chocolate Cloud ApS, per its site footer (2026-10-23).
Is IronShard safe?
We do not audit vendors. What IronShard publishes, read 2026-10-23: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, CSA STAR stated on its trust center.
Is IronShard HIPAA compliant?
IronShard states HIPAA compliance on its trust center (2026-10-23). We have not verified it.
What are alternatives to IronShard?
In Developer tools, by use: Egnyte, New Relic, Railway, Blink, Merge, Open WebUI.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.
How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk
Cookies
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.