Skip to content
Kodem logo

Kodem

Correlates code, dependency and live-workload runtime evidence to show which vulnerabilities are reachable, and verifies that fixes hold.

From $20,000/yrActively maintained

At a glanceswept Oct 13, 2026

≈ 361visits/mo

Little sign of use · estimate, read Oct 13, 2026

For
AppSec teams prioritizing exploitable application risk across code and production runtime
Price
From $20,000/yrpricing page, read Oct 17, 2026
Activity
Actively maintainedsite updated 6 days ago
Company
Kodem Security, Inc. · since 2021 · ~51 peoplesite footer · per their site · per their About page
Used for
  • rank code findings by whether they run in production
  • attribute AI agent actions to the agent that caused them
  • verify that a fix changed the runtime outcome
read off kodemsecurity.com on Oct 17, 2026
Worth knowingcomputed from what we read · each with its source
  • Used more than 74% of the 1,756 tools on its shelfINITE Atlas →
  • On the web since 2021, older than 84% of its shelfINITE Atlas
  • Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
  • Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantskodemsecurity.com ↗
Pricingpricing page, read Oct 17, 2026

From $20,000/yr

The companyeach fact with its source · read Oct 17, 2026
Your datawhat they publish, each line with its page · read Oct 17, 2026

These are Kodem's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.

How a program reaches itfound, not claimed · read Oct 17, 2026
  • MCP servercom.kodemsecurity/kodemverified in the MCP registry
  • Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-17
  • Address to connectapi.kodemsecurity.com/mcp
  • MCP docskodemsecurity.com/platform/mcp-serverthe vendor's page ↗

MCP server details →

This card as JSON, for your agent →

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

Alternatives in Developer toolsby use, among tools still maintained

Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since

Compare Kodem with

Pick up to two.

All 10 alternatives to Kodem →

All Developer tools tools →

Not it? Say what you need

beta

Three tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.

From people who use itnot part of the reading

No notes yet. What do you use Kodem for?

Sign in to leave a note
Questions this page answers
  • What is Kodem?

    Correlates code, dependency and live-workload runtime evidence to show which vulnerabilities are reachable, and verifies that fixes hold. It is listed in the Atlas under Developer tools and made by Kodem Security, Inc.

  • Who is Kodem for?

    AppSec teams prioritizing exploitable application risk across code and production runtime

  • How much does Kodem cost?

    Paid plans start at $20,000/yr, per Kodem's pricing page on 2026-10-17.

  • Is Kodem free?

    No. Its pricing page showed no free plan on 2026-10-17.

  • Do people use Kodem?

    Little sign of use: ≈ 361 visits/mo · estimate, 2026-10.

  • Is Kodem still maintained?

    Actively maintained: site updated 6 days ago.

  • Who owns Kodem?

    Kodem is run by Kodem Security, Inc., per its site footer (2026-10-17).

  • What are alternatives to Kodem?

    In Developer tools, by use: Autonomous pentesting, continuous monitoring, Gitar, CodeRabbit, World Monitor, Frederick AI, Superset.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.

How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk