Kodem
From $20,000/yrActively maintained
≈ 361visits/mo
Little sign of use · estimate, read Oct 13, 2026
- For
- AppSec teams prioritizing exploitable application risk across code and production runtime
- Price
- From $20,000/yrpricing page, read Oct 17, 2026
- Activity
- Actively maintainedsite updated 6 days ago
- Company
- Kodem Security, Inc. · since 2021 · ~51 peoplesite footer · per their site · per their About page
- Used for
- rank code findings by whether they run in production
- attribute AI agent actions to the agent that caused them
- verify that a fix changed the runtime outcome
- Used more than 74% of the 1,756 tools on its shelfINITE Atlas →
- On the web since 2021, older than 84% of its shelfINITE Atlas
- Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
- Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantskodemsecurity.com ↗
From $20,000/yr
- Founded2021per their site ↗
- People~51per their About page ↗
- Raised$18M · Series Aper the press · 2023-06 ↗
- Run byKodem Security, Inc.site footer ↗
- Privacy policy updated2022-09-05privacy policy ↗
These are Kodem's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.
- MCP servercom.kodemsecurity/kodemverified in the MCP registry
- Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-17
- Address to connectapi.kodemsecurity.com/mcp
- MCP docskodemsecurity.com/platform/mcp-serverthe vendor's page ↗
This card as JSON, for your agent →
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1
Autonomous pentesting, continuous monitoringMCP · sign-in
Scans web apps, networks and cloud for vulnerabilities, then exploits them where supported to prove risk, with reports and an autonomous pentest agent.
107kActiveFrom $96/mo2017 - #2
Gitar
Verifies and fixes code issues in CI/CD workflows, with AI agents that review pull requests and remediate technical debt.
72.4kActiveFrom $34/mo2007 - #3
CodeRabbit
Automatically reviews pull requests, prioritizes them by risk, and scans for security vulnerabilities.
24.4kActiveFrom $30/user/mo2023 - #4
World MonitorMCP · sign-in
Streams geopolitical, shipping, market and infrastructure signals onto a live map with correlation alerts.
15.8kActiveFrom $39.99/mo2026 - #5
Frederick AI
Deploys AI agents that build software applications and automate recurring business tasks.
7.3kActiveFrom $25/mo - #6
Superset
Orchestrates multiple coding agents in parallel workspaces with isolated branches and code review.
6.1kActiveFrom $15/user/mo2025
Not it? Say what you need
betaThree tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.
No notes yet. What do you use Kodem for?
Sign in to leave a noteWhat is Kodem?
Correlates code, dependency and live-workload runtime evidence to show which vulnerabilities are reachable, and verifies that fixes hold. It is listed in the Atlas under Developer tools and made by Kodem Security, Inc.
Who is Kodem for?
AppSec teams prioritizing exploitable application risk across code and production runtime
How much does Kodem cost?
Paid plans start at $20,000/yr, per Kodem's pricing page on 2026-10-17.
Is Kodem free?
No. Its pricing page showed no free plan on 2026-10-17.
Do people use Kodem?
Little sign of use: ≈ 361 visits/mo · estimate, 2026-10.
Is Kodem still maintained?
Actively maintained: site updated 6 days ago.
Who owns Kodem?
Kodem is run by Kodem Security, Inc., per its site footer (2026-10-17).
What are alternatives to Kodem?
In Developer tools, by use: Autonomous pentesting, continuous monitoring, Gitar, CodeRabbit, World Monitor, Frederick AI, Superset.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.
How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk