Skip to content

LivingMeta

Screens and classifies research papers, extracts claims with verbatim source quotes, and derives research-gap agendas for living systematic reviews.

KnowledgeData extractionChat assistantSearch
livingmeta.ai ↗
AlternativesSet it up for my teamIs LivingMeta yours? Claim the card →
At a glanceswept 2026-10-12

not read yet

Use

For
Researchers and doctoral students running systematic reviews, theses, or grant proposals who face screening and extraction backlogs.
Price
Price not read
Activity
Maintainedsite updated 3 months ago
Company
Domain since 2026domain registered
Used for
  • screen large paper sets for relevance with visible classifier decisions
  • extract methodology, sample design, and effect sizes from papers
  • identify research gaps and rank next research questions
The companyeach fact with its source · read 2026-10-13
  • Domain since2026domain registered
Your datawhat they publish, each line with its page · read 2026-10-13

“We have opted out of having this data used to train the provider s models .”

privacy policy ↗

These are LivingMeta's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.

How a program reaches itfound, not claimed · read 2026-10-13
  • MCP serverai.livingmeta/ai-in-researchverified in the MCP registry
  • Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-13
  • Address to connectai-in-research.livingmeta.ai/mcp
  • API docslivingmeta.ai/api/agent.jsonthe vendor's page ↗

MCP server details →

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

Alternatives in Knowledgeby use, among tools still maintained

Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since

Compare LivingMeta with

Pick up to two.

All Knowledge tools →

Questions this page answers
  • What is LivingMeta?

    Screens and classifies research papers, extracts claims with verbatim source quotes, and derives research-gap agendas for living systematic reviews. It is listed in the Atlas under Knowledge.

  • Who is LivingMeta for?

    Researchers and doctoral students running systematic reviews, theses, or grant proposals who face screening and extraction backlogs.

  • Do people use LivingMeta?

    Little sign of use.

  • Is LivingMeta still maintained?

    Maintained: site updated 3 months ago.

  • Does LivingMeta train AI on your data?

    Yes, per its privacy policy (2026-10-13): “We have opted out of having this data used to train the provider s models .”

  • Is LivingMeta safe?

    We do not audit vendors. What LivingMeta publishes, read 2026-10-13: GDPR stated on its privacy policy; on training with your data, “We have opted out of having this data used to train the provider s models .”.

  • What are alternatives to LivingMeta?

    In Knowledge, by use: Keenious Pro, Refyc, Flows, Auramiq, Remo, Portable Lawyer.

Not quite it? Describe the job

beta

Five tools from the Atlas that fit it, each judged against what you wrote.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.