Octopus Code Review
Automatically reviews pull requests with context from your codebase using AI models.
≈ 2visits/mo
Emerging · estimate, read 2026-09-19
- For
- Development teams using AI coding agents to review pull requests automatically
- Price
- Free planpricing page, read 2026-09-20
- Activity
- Maintainednothing dated on the site
- Company
- founding year not on record
- Runs as
- APICLI
- Review pull requests with repository context and team standards
- Query codebase with RAG chat backed by actual source code
- Run code reviews from terminal with team standards applied
- #18
Kiro
Converts prompts into executable specifications and implements code with parallel agents that validate correctness.
32.7kActiveFrom $20/user/mo - #25
Devin
Executes software engineering tasks including code migrations, bug fixes, testing, and documentation generation across multiple repositories.
30.6kActiveFrom $20/mo - #27
Remy prompt
Builds websites, designs slides, and generates images through conversational AI.
30.9knot read— - #34
Nous Research
Trains and releases open source language models with infrastructure for distributed training.
33.7knot read— - #40
Replit
Builds and deploys web apps, websites, and agents from natural language descriptions.
278knot readFrom $20/mo - #42
Lovable
Builds production-grade web and mobile applications from natural language descriptions.
198knot readFree plan2023
What is Octopus Code Review?
Automatically reviews pull requests with context from your codebase using AI models.
Who is Octopus Code Review for?
Development teams using AI coding agents to review pull requests automatically
How much does Octopus Code Review cost?
Octopus Code Review has a free plan, per its pricing page on 2026-09-20.
Do people use Octopus Code Review?
Emerging: ≈ 2 visits a month · estimate, 2026-09.
Is Octopus Code Review still maintained?
Maintained.
What are alternatives to Octopus Code Review?
In Developer tools, by use: Kiro, Devin, Remy prompt, Nous Research, Replit, Lovable.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one row at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.