Olbrain
From $24/moActively maintained
- Is it safe? Run by Olbrain Labs Private Limited. Its policy says it does not train on your data.See ↓
- Is it free? From $24/mo · pricing page, read Oct 29, 2026See ↓
- What else does this?
Sentient Foundation
agor
Resolve AI CopilotSee ↓
not read yet
Use
- For
- Enterprises wanting coordinated AI agent systems for business workflows, such as recurring finance forecasting.
- Price
- From $24/mopricing page, read Oct 29, 2026
- Activity
- Actively maintainedsite updated 7 days ago
- Company
- Olbrain Labs Private Limited · since 2017privacy policy · per their site
- Used for
- model revenue and cost scenarios for a finance review
- send agent replies to people on any channel
- run scheduled jobs over rows, PDFs and web searches
- On the web since 2017, older than 96% of its shelfINITE Atlas
- Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
- Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsolbrain.com ↗
- Founded2017per their site ↗
- Run byOlbrain Labs Private Limitedprivacy policy ↗
- Trains on your dataNotrust center ↗
- Certifications they stateSOC 2 · ISO 27001privacy policy ↗
- Trust centertheir owntrust center ↗
- Security contactsecurity.txt
“Customer data is never used to train models.”
trust center ↗
These are Olbrain's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.
- MCP servercom.olbrain/alchemistverified in the MCP registry
- Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-29
- Address to connectalchemist.olbrain.com/mcp
- API docsolbrain.com/developersthe vendor's page ↗
This card as JSON, for your agent →
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1
Sentient Foundation
Builds open-source AI models and agent frameworks, including a recursive planner-executor for multi-step tasks and an open deep-search agent.
6.7k - #2
agor
Multiplayer platform for managing persistent AI agents with shared memory, skills, and team-wide workflows.
498Active - #3
Resolve AI Copilot
Runs agents that investigate production alerts on call, trace root causes across code, infrastructure and telemetry, and automate routine operational tasks.
3.8kActivePay per use - #4
WebRunMCP · open
Runs browsing agents that carry out business tasks on websites, governed by rule policies, with persistent browser storage and memory.
279ActiveFrom $20/mo2024 - #5
AgentPMTMCP · sign-in
Builds agents and repeatable workflows that chain model calls with external tools, run on schedules, and log every tool call.
14ActiveFrom $0.01 per use
Not it? Say what you need
betaThree tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.
No notes yet. What do you use Olbrain for?
Sign in to leave a noteWhat is Olbrain?
Runs coordinated agent systems that hand off tasks between enterprise teams, scoped and built by its engineers or from a coding assistant. It is listed in the Atlas under Agents and made by Olbrain Labs Private Limited.
Who is Olbrain for?
Enterprises wanting coordinated AI agent systems for business workflows, such as recurring finance forecasting.
How much does Olbrain cost?
Paid plans start at $24/mo, per Olbrain's pricing page on 2026-10-29.
Is Olbrain still maintained?
Actively maintained: site updated 7 days ago.
Who owns Olbrain?
Olbrain is run by Olbrain Labs Private Limited, per its privacy policy (2026-10-29).
Does Olbrain train AI on your data?
No, per its trust center (2026-10-29): “Customer data is never used to train models.”
Is Olbrain safe?
We do not audit vendors. What Olbrain publishes, read 2026-10-29: SOC 2, ISO 27001 stated on its privacy policy; on training with your data, “Customer data is never used to train models.”.
What are alternatives to Olbrain?
In Agents, by use: Sentient Foundation, agor, Resolve AI Copilot, WebRun, AgentPMT.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.
How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk
Cookies
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.