
PatentReply
Free plan · From $59/user/moActively maintained
- Is it safe? Run by Patent Agentic LLC. Its policy says it does not train on your data.See ↓
- Is it free? Free plan · From $59/user/mo · pricing page, read Nov 1, 2026See ↓
- What else does this?
Ezel
Lightbringer
Bidda AIfreeSee ↓
≈ 123visits/mo
Too new to rank yet · estimate, read Oct 18, 2026
- For
- Patent attorneys and agents working USPTO applications with an AI assistant
- Price
- Free plan · From $59/user/mopricing page, read Nov 1, 2026
- Activity
- Actively maintainedrelease 7 days ago · site updated yesterday
- Company
- Patent Agentic LLC · Domain since 2025privacy policy · domain registered
- Used for
- Review claim amendment history across office actions
- Check rejection arguments against cited references
- Draft office action responses from the prosecution record
- Used more than 67% of the 227 tools on its shelfINITE Atlas →
- Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
- Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantspatentreply.ai ↗
- Run byPatent Agentic LLCprivacy policy ↗
- Trains on your dataNosecurity page ↗
- Certifications they stateSOC 2security page ↗
- Trust centertheir owntrust center ↗
- Privacy policy updated2026-10-02privacy policy ↗
“4 PatentReply does not train models on your matters.”
security page ↗
These are PatentReply's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.
- MCP serverai.patentreply/patentreplyverified in the MCP registry
- Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-11-01
- Address to connectmcp.patentreply.ai/mcp/v2
- MCP docspatentreply.ai/connectthe vendor's page ↗
This card as JSON, for your agent →
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1

EzelMCP · sign-in
Drafts, reviews and tracks changes to legal documents, answers questions from uploaded case files with citations, and fills court forms.
12.2kFrom $49 once - #2

LightbringerMCP · open
Patent drafting, filing and prosecution service where an AI platform tracks office actions and attorneys review every application.
438Active2023 - #3

Bidda AIMCP · open
Serves regulations as compliance nodes with plain-English summaries, step-by-step workflows, primary legal citations and SHA-256 hashes via API.
336ActiveFrom $49/mo - #4

AI Law TrackerMCP · open
Matches a company's operations and AI use against source-linked AI laws and enforcement actions to list applicable regulatory obligations.
12ActiveFrom $49/mo - #5

ArxoMCP · open
Turns laws, standards and textbooks into versioned models that return answers with the rules and source edition applied.
8Active
Not it? Say what you need
betaThree tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.
No notes yet. What do you use PatentReply for?
Sign in to leave a noteWhat is PatentReply?
Retrieves a U.S. patent application's prosecution record from the USPTO and gives AI clients a structured, source-linked file wrapper. It is listed in the Atlas under Legal and made by Patent Agentic LLC.
Who is PatentReply for?
Patent attorneys and agents working USPTO applications with an AI assistant
How much does PatentReply cost?
PatentReply has a free plan; paid plans start at $59/user/mo, per its pricing page on 2026-11-01.
Is PatentReply free?
Yes, PatentReply has a free plan, per its pricing page on 2026-11-01.
Do people use PatentReply?
Little sign of use: ≈ 123 visits/mo · estimate, 2026-10.
Is PatentReply still maintained?
Actively maintained: release 7 days ago · site updated yesterday.
Who owns PatentReply?
PatentReply is run by Patent Agentic LLC, per its privacy policy (2026-11-01).
Does PatentReply train AI on your data?
No, per its security page (2026-11-01): “4 PatentReply does not train models on your matters.”
Is PatentReply safe?
We do not audit vendors. What PatentReply publishes, read 2026-11-01: SOC 2 stated on its security page; on training with your data, “4 PatentReply does not train models on your matters.”.
How do I cancel PatentReply?
In its own words (terms of service, 2026-11-01): “You can cancel at any time with Manage subscription on the Billing page.”
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.
How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk
Cookies
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.