Skip to content

Reply.io

No description yet. We write these ourselves, one line each, and a row waits rather than repeating the vendor's own copy.

Atlas Readinesssweptswept 2026-09-16

81/100

#7 of 60 rated Sales tools#84 of 537 in the Atlas
  • Entity15/25
  • Machine-readable32.6/35
  • Retrieval access17/20
  • Footprintnot read
out of 80 of 100 points — footprint not read
Against the fieldsweptreadiness, out of 100
  • Reply.io81
  • Sales medianof 60 rated61
  • Atlas medianof 537 rated61
What the sweep readsweptswept 2026-09-16
  • Retrieval botspartialverify

    Whether the bots that decide citations are let in. Training bots are a separate list and are not counted here.

  • llms.txtyesverify

    A plain-text index at /llms.txt. Optional; read by some tools.

  • Organization schemayes

    schema.org Organization markup on the homepage, which is what a resolver reads a company's name and links from.

  • Wikidata itemQ99542663

    Matched on the official website, never on the name. The substrate under the knowledge graph an engine resolves names against.

  • Server-rendered words3.6kswept

    What a reader without JavaScript receives from the homepage.

  • Identity score93/100swept

    The analyzer's crawl-only section, 0-100: identity files, schema, crawler policy, sitemap. Not the analyzer score.

Company factsper Wikidata · read 2026-09-17
  • Founded2014P571
  • HeadquartersSan JoseP159
  • Industrysoftware industryP452
Position in Salesswept53 swept

93/100

identity score

0identity score, 0-100100
87th percentile of 53 · median 75
Similar toolssweptSales · nearest readiness

Not measured with the analyzer.

The full run asks four engines about this company by name. It runs on request, not on a schedule.

Questions this page answers
  • What is Reply.io?

    Reply.io is listed in the INITE Atlas under Sales. We write each line ourselves and have not written this one yet.

  • What is Reply.io's Atlas Readiness?

    81 of 100 on 2026-09-16, computed from four parts — entity, machine-readable, retrieval access, footprint — out of 80 of 100 points — footprint not read. It places #7 of 60 rated Sales tools.

  • Does Reply.io let AI retrieval bots in?

    Partly. On 2026-09-16, reply.io fenced some paths from retrieval crawlers.

  • Does Reply.io publish an llms.txt?

    Yes: reply.io/llms.txt was present on 2026-09-16.

  • Is Reply.io a Wikidata entity?

    Yes: Q99542663, matched on its official website.

How to read a row

swept
Read by a crawler: HTTP and parsing, no model call. Every row, every week.
measured
The full analyzer run, asked of four engines. Shown only where the company agreed to show it.

Can a retrieval engine find, resolve and quote this site? Four parts, each read by the sweep, each shown beside the total.

Entity 25 · Machine-readable 35 · Retrieval access 20 · Footprint 20

A part that was never read is left out and the total is rescaled to what was. It is never counted as zero.

Measure your own site