RowAttest
From $49 per useActively maintained
- Is it safe? Run by RW Digital Ventures LLC. Its policy says it does not train on your data.See ↓
- Is it free? From $49 per use · pricing page, read Oct 27, 2026See ↓
- What else does this?
Nexus Void Automated Penetration Testingfree
AI Release Assurance
ArcjetSee ↓
not read yet
Use
- For
- Teams running Supabase apps who need proof that row level security isolates tenants
- Price
- From $49 per usepricing page, read Oct 27, 2026
- Activity
- Actively maintainedrelease 2 weeks ago · site updated 7 days ago
- Company
- RW Digital Ventures LLC · Domain since 2026 (registered this year)privacy policy · domain registered
- Used for
- test whether Supabase row level security blocks cross-tenant data reads
- get a signed PDF report of isolation test results
- share a public link that verifies a report's authenticity
- Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
- Run byRW Digital Ventures LLCprivacy policy ↗
- Trains on your dataNoprivacy policy ↗
- Privacy policy updated2026-10-16privacy policy ↗
“We do not use your project's data, your results or your reports to train AI models, and we do not pass your credentials to anyone; the only services that touch your data are the processors in B9, each only to provide its service to us.”
privacy policy ↗
These are RowAttest's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.
- MCP servercom.rowattest/rowattestverified in the MCP registry
- Stateanswers, 6 toolschecked 2026-10-27
- Address to connectapp.rowattest.com/mcp
- MCP docsrowattest.com/mcpthe vendor's page ↗
This card as JSON, for your agent →
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1
Nexus Void Automated Penetration Testing
Runs continuous automated penetration testing and compliance verification with human-supervised attack agents.
42.9kActiveFrom $49/mo - #2
AI Release Assurance
Runs automated security tests against chatbots, agents, and APIs to find prompt injection, data leaks, and unsafe behavior before release.
1ActiveFrom $499/mo - #3
ArcjetMCP · sign-in
Checks each action an AI agent takes against prompt injection, PII, bot and policy rules before the call runs, and logs the decision.
738ActiveFrom $25/mo - #4
Bynn Document Fraud Detection SoftwareMCP · sign-in
Analyzes uploaded PDFs and images for forgery, post-signature edits and AI-generated content, returning an authenticity report via dashboard or webhook.
552ActiveFrom $99/mo2003 - #5
CyberNativeMCP · sign-in
Flags risky model-loading patterns in public Hugging Face repositories and wiring errors in saved ComfyUI workflow files.
5Active
Not it? Say what you need
betaThree tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.
No notes yet. What do you use RowAttest for?
Sign in to leave a noteWhat is RowAttest?
Runs real cross-tenant attack attempts against a Supabase app's row level security and signs the findings in a report. It is listed in the Atlas under Security and made by RW Digital Ventures LLC.
Who is RowAttest for?
Teams running Supabase apps who need proof that row level security isolates tenants
How much does RowAttest cost?
Paid plans start at $49 per use, per RowAttest's pricing page on 2026-10-27.
Do people use RowAttest?
Little sign of use.
Is RowAttest still maintained?
Actively maintained: release 2 weeks ago · site updated 7 days ago.
Who owns RowAttest?
RowAttest is run by RW Digital Ventures LLC, per its privacy policy (2026-10-27).
Does RowAttest train AI on your data?
No, per its privacy policy (2026-10-27): “We do not use your project's data, your results or your reports to train AI models, and we do not pass your credentials to anyone; the only services that touch your data are the processors in B9, each only to provide its service to us.”
Is RowAttest safe?
We do not audit vendors. What RowAttest publishes, read 2026-10-27: on training with your data, “We do not use your project's data, your results or your reports to train AI models, and we do not pass your credentials to anyone; the only services that touch your data are the processors in B9, each only to provide its service to us.”.
What are alternatives to RowAttest?
In Security, by use: Nexus Void Automated Penetration Testing, AI Release Assurance, Arcjet, Bynn Document Fraud Detection Software, CyberNative.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.
How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk
Cookies
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.