
Signa
Actively maintained
- Is it safe? Run by Signa Technologies Ltd. Its policy says it does not train on your data.See ↓
- Is it free? We have not read the prices of Signa yet; they are next in our queue. Until then, the official site has them.signa.so ↗
- What else does this?
Brandfetchfree
Cosmicfree
GlobalGPTSee ↓
not read yet
Use
- For
- developers and platform teams needing trademark search and screening data via API
- Activity
- Actively maintainedrelease yesterday · site updated yesterday
- Company
- Signa Technologies Ltdprivacy policy
- How it runs
- API
- Used for
- query several national trademark registers in one request
- screen a proposed brand name for likely conflicts before launch
- monitor new filings and get alerts on similar marks
- Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
- Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantssigna.so ↗
- HeadquartersPaphos, CYper their site
- Run bySigna Technologies Ltdprivacy policy ↗
- Trains on your dataNoprivacy policy ↗
- Certifications they stateGDPRtrust center ↗
- Trust centertheir owntrust center ↗
- Privacy policy updated2026-08-25privacy policy ↗
“By default, Signa does not use your individual trademark searches or queries to train, fine-tune, or improve AI/ML models.”
privacy policy ↗
These are Signa's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.
- MCP serverso.signa/signaverified in the MCP registry
- Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-11-03
- Address to connectapi.signa.so/mcp
- Status pagelinked from the homepagestatus.signa.so ↗
This card as JSON, for your agent →
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1

Brandfetch
Provides API access to a database of brand logos, colors, and assets for integration into applications.
1.2MActiveFrom $99/mo - #2

Cosmic
Headless CMS that stores structured content in custom models and serves it over REST and GraphQL APIs to websites and apps.
11kActiveFrom $99/mo2016 - #3

GlobalGPTMCP · sign-in
Provides unified access to 100+ AI models including GPT, Claude, Gemini, and video generation tools via web or CLI.
87.3kActiveFrom $5.80/mo2023 - #4

CometAPI
Unified API providing access to 500 AI models with OpenAI-compatible interface and transparent pricing.
6.8kActiveFree plan - #5

TwitterapiMCP · open
Returns public X posts, profiles, follower graphs and trends over a REST API, billed per result returned.
11.7kActiveFrom $0.00 per use2024
Not it? Say what you need
betaThree tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.
No notes yet. What do you use Signa for?
Sign in to leave a noteWhat is Signa?
A REST API that searches, screens and monitors trademark records across USPTO, EUIPO, WIPO and UKIPO registers. It is listed in the Atlas under Developer tools and made by Signa Technologies Ltd.
Who is Signa for?
developers and platform teams needing trademark search and screening data via API
Is Signa still maintained?
Actively maintained: release yesterday · site updated yesterday.
Who owns Signa?
Signa is run by Signa Technologies Ltd, per its privacy policy (2026-11-03).
Does Signa train AI on your data?
No, per its privacy policy (2026-11-03): “By default, Signa does not use your individual trademark searches or queries to train, fine-tune, or improve AI/ML models.”
Is Signa safe?
We do not audit vendors. What Signa publishes, read 2026-11-03: GDPR stated on its trust center; on training with your data, “By default, Signa does not use your individual trademark searches or queries to train, fine-tune, or improve AI/ML models.”.
Does Signa give refunds?
In its own words (terms of service, 2026-11-03): “All fees are non-refundable except as expressly stated in these Terms or as required by applicable law.”
What are alternatives to Signa?
In Developer tools, by use: Brandfetch, Cosmic, GlobalGPT, CometAPI, Twitterapi.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.
How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.