Clay vs Apollo.io
The same facts the Atlas reads for every tool, side by side, each with its page and date. No winner: which fits depends on the job.
Where they differ
visits a month · estimate · log scale
- 2.8×Clay gets about 2.8× the visits of Apollo.io.visit estimates, read 2026-09-17
- $49Apollo.io starts lower: $49/mo against $185/mo.pricing pages, read 2026-09-19 and 2026-09-19
- FreeBoth have a free plan.pricing pages, read 2026-09-19 and 2026-09-19
- SOC 2Only Apollo.io names SOC 2 on its pages.their trust and security pages
Price & plans
| Price & plans | Clay | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free plan · From $185/mopricing page, read 2026-09-19 | Free plan · From $49/mopricing page, read 2026-09-19 |
| Free plan | Yespricing page, read 2026-09-19 | Yespricing page, read 2026-09-19 |
| Paid plans from | $185/mopricing page, read 2026-09-19 | $49/mopricing page, read 2026-09-19 |
| Free trial | free trialpricing page | not on their pricing page |
| Paying yearly | save 10% yearlypricing page | not on their pricing page |
Who it's for & what it does
| Who it's for & what it does | Clay | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Centralizes first and third-party data sources and enriches prospect lists for sales outreach campaigns. | Unifies prospect data and runs background agents to automate outreach, research, and meeting booking across sales tools. |
| For | Go-to-market teams building prospecting workflows and enriching prospect data | Go-to-market teams building outbound sales motions and managing prospect data |
| What people do with it |
|
|
| How it runs | Hosted only · API · CLI | Hosted only |
| Shelf | Sales | Sales |
Use & momentum
| Use & momentum | Clay | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Use | ||
| Visits | ≈ 297k visits/moestimate, read 2026-09-17 | ≈ 108k visits/moestimate, read 2026-09-17 |
| Activity | Actively maintainedrelease 3 days ago · site updated yesterday | Actively maintainedsite updated yesterday |
Your data & compliance
| Your data & compliance | Clay | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Trains AI on your data | not stated on the pages we read | Yestheir words |
| Certifications | GDPR · CCPAtheir words | SOC 2 Type II · ISO 27001 · GDPR · PCI DSS · CCPAtheir words |
| Trust center | none found | SafeBasetrust center |
| Privacy policy updated | not stated on the pages we read | 2026-08-10privacy policy |
For developers: API & MCP
| For developers: API & MCP | Clay | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| MCP server | none in the MCP registry | io.github.apolloio/apollo-mcpchecked 2026-10-08 |
| When we asked it | none in the MCP registry | answers, requires sign-in |
| Status page | linked from the homepagestatus.clay.com | none found |
The company
| The company | Clay | Apollo.io |
|---|---|---|
| Run by | Clay Labs Inc.site footer | ZenLeads, Inc.privacy policy |
| Founded | not on record | 2015per Wikidata |
| Domain since | 1992domain registered | not on record |
| People | not on record | ~850per their site |
| Raised | $5Bper their About page | not on record |
| Headquarters | San Franciscoper their About page | San Franciscoper Wikidata |
What is the difference between Clay and Apollo.io?
Clay: Centralizes first and third-party data sources and enriches prospect lists for sales outreach campaigns. Apollo.io: Unifies prospect data and runs background agents to automate outreach, research, and meeting booking across sales tools.
Which is cheaper, Clay or Apollo.io?
Clay starts at $185/mo (pricing page, 2026-09-19); Apollo.io starts at $49/mo (pricing page, 2026-09-19). Plans and limits differ; both pages are linked above.
Which is more widely used, Clay or Apollo.io?
Clay: about 297k visits/mo; Apollo.io: about 108k (estimates, 2026-09-17).
Do Clay or Apollo.io train AI on your data?
Clay: its pages do not say plainly. Apollo.io: yes, in its own words: “We may use information collected through the Services, including Contributor Database records and Usage Data, to train internal models.”
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.