INITE / SAMPLE REPORT
This is the whole report.
Not a mock-up, and not a best case. A full run of the analyzer against inite.studio — a site we own — frozen exactly as it came back.
A sample exists because the alternative is asking you to buy a measurement you have never seen. The score below is whatever the instrument said about us that day, including the parts that are unflattering.
What you are looking at
- Subject
- https://inite.studio
- Measured
- 2026-11-01 UTC
- Engines queried
- Claude (anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5), ChatGPT (openai/gpt-6.1-sol), Gemini (google/gemini-3.8-flash), Perplexity (perplexity/sonar)
- Depth
- Full paid run. A part that could not be measured that day is marked as not measured, never filled in
- Edited
- No measurement altered. The score is recomputed on today's scale from the same measurements, and the verbatim answer text is dropped where the report does not display it.
Regenerated from a real run, never written by hand.
AI Visibility Score
Some sections need work
No brand mentions to assess
Brand never mentioned — no position to measure
Brand never mentioned — displacement is already priced in share of voice
Scored over the sections actually measured: 72 of 90 weight · medium confidence · 20 prompts × 7 runs × 4 engines, single run · How this is measured
Critical issues
Absent from Google top-10 for buyer queries
The domain does not rank top-10 for any tested buyer query. Roughly 40% of Google AI Overview citations come from top-10 organic results (seoClarity, 362k queries, Oct 2025), and other 2026 measurements put it between 17% and 52% — ranking is one of the larger inputs to being cited, not the only one.
→ AI Overviews and Perplexity are unlikely to cite you until organic rankings improve
INITE Studio
INITE Studio is a Model Context Protocol server plus 26 markdown skills that turn Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or any Anthropic SDK app into an AI startup idea-audit pipeline. It provides raw data fetching, deterministic scoring, and audit persistence, while reasoning runs on the user's own Anthropic tokens. Its audits produce a GO, REFINE, or KILL verdict with a 0-100 investor-readiness score across nine investor lenses and 25 live data sources.
Main products
- Idea audit: AI-driven startup idea audit that returns a GO, REFINE, or KILL verdict with a 0-100 score across six weighted dimensions (Team, Problem-Solution, Traction, Competition, GTM, Financials)
- MCP server: Model Context Protocol server with 100+ tools across 6 categories for fetching SERP, Trends, app store, Reddit, web search and pure-math signal data
- Skills: 26 open markdown skills installed into ~/.claude/skills that Claude follows step-by-step for auditing ideas
- Dashboard: persistent audit history with full markdown reports, lens-by-lens breakdown, quota meters, investor uploads and billing
- Roadshow Pack: 1-pager teaser, pitch blurbs, email templates and best-fit investor matches with 0-100 scores per investor
- Idea TV: live channel that streams audit verdicts as cards in real time
- BYOK: bring-your-own-key support for Perplexity, Tavily, Exa, Brave, DataForSEO, Firecrawl, Apify and other data providers
AI Citation Audit
How AI models talk about your brand
Model memory
Stability: stable · n=7What AI models recall about your brand WITHOUT browsing — brand awareness baked into their training data.
0%
Share of Voice
95% CI 0–16% · 20 prompts
—
Avg. Sentiment
—
Avg. Position
Not mentioned
AI search visibility
The same queries with web search ENABLED — what AI search actually surfaces and cites today.
3%
Mentioned in AI search answers
95% CI 0–21% · 20 prompts
3%
Your domain cited as a source
2 answers cite your site
Engines chose to search on 83% of these answers — the rest were answered from model memory, with search available.
Domains AI search cites for your queries:
The answers, one by one
60 answers recorded — 20 buyer questions across 3 AI systems, each with the source it cited and the time it was measured.
How do I know if my startup idea is worth pursuing before I quit my job?
I have too many startup ideas, how can I objectively decide which one to build first?
How can I stop wasting months building a product nobody wants?
What tools can audit a startup idea and give me an investor-readiness score?
Is there an MCP server for startup idea validation that works with Claude?
What Claude skills can I install to validate a business idea step by step?
Best AI tools to validate a startup idea using real market data like Google Trends and Reddit?
Can I use Claude Code to run a full due diligence on my startup idea?
Best AI startup idea validators that give a GO or KILL verdict?
Alternatives to generic ChatGPT idea validation that use live data sources for competition and demand research?
Which startup validation tools let me bring my own API keys for Perplexity, Tavily or Exa?
What tool can score my startup the way different investors would see it?
Is there a tool that matches my startup with best-fit investors and generates a pitch teaser?
Who can help me run an investor-readiness audit on my idea without paying for expensive consultants?
AI startup idea audit tool that runs on my own Anthropic tokens instead of charging for AI usage
What dimensions do investors use to evaluate an early-stage startup idea?
How do I build a scoring framework for startup idea validation?
How can I use Google Trends and app store data to validate market demand?
How do I use Reddit to find real customer pain points for a startup idea?
What is the Model Context Protocol and how do I build an MCP server for Claude?
Engines queried: Claude (anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5; anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5 for 12 prompts), ChatGPT (openai/gpt-6.1-sol; openai/gpt-6-luna for 12 prompts), Gemini (google/gemini-3.8-flash), Perplexity (perplexity/sonar)
| Engine | Share of Voice | Mentions | Avg. Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude | 0% | 0/20 | — |
| ChatGPT | 0% | 0/20 | — |
| Gemini | 0% | 0/20 | — |
| Perplexity | 0% | 0/20 | — |
Query Results
Competitor Displacement
Brands that AI mentions instead of yours
Where AI search gets its answers
The sites AI search cited when it answered your buyers' questions, from 50 answers that listed their sources. Not part of the score.
| Site | Kind | Answers citing it | Named you | Named competitors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| github.com | Directory | 17 | 2 | 4 |
| preuve.ai | Media and blogs | 14 | 1 | 7 |
| code.claude.com | Other | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| ideaproof.io | Competitor | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| startupconcept.ai | Other | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| startupignition.com | Media and blogs | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| startups.com | Media and blogs | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| dev.to | Media and blogs | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| evalyze.ai | Media and blogs | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| f6s.com | Other | 3 | 0 | 3 |
182 more sites are not shown.
Where to get mentioned
These sites were cited in answers that named your competitors and not you. A mention there is the likeliest way into those answers.
- startupconcept.aiOther
Cited in 4 answers that named IdeaProof, ValidatorAI and not you.
Questions: “Best AI tools to validate a startup idea using real market data like Google Trends and Reddit?” · “Best AI startup idea validators that give a GO or KILL verdict?” · “Alternatives to generic ChatGPT idea validation that use live data sources for competition and demand research?”
- f6s.comOther
Cited in 3 answers that named ValidatorAI, IdeaProof, Equidam and not you.
- https://www.f6s.com/software/category/startup-idea-validation
- https://www.f6s.com/software/category/startup-valuation
Questions: “What tools can audit a startup idea and give me an investor-readiness score?” · “Best AI tools to validate a startup idea using real market data like Google Trends and Reddit?” · “What tool can score my startup the way different investors would see it?”
- worthbuild.ioMedia and blogs
Cited in 3 answers that named IdeaProof, ValidatorAI and not you.
Questions: “Best AI tools to validate a startup idea using real market data like Google Trends and Reddit?” · “Best AI startup idea validators that give a GO or KILL verdict?” · “Alternatives to generic ChatGPT idea validation that use live data sources for competition and demand research?”
- startupignition.comMedia and blogs
Cited in 2 answers that named ValidatorAI, IdeaProof and not you.
- https://www.startupignition.com/toolsuite/tools/
- https://www.startupignition.com/news/best-ai-tools-for-startup-validation/
- https://www.startupignition.com/news/startup-validation-tools-compared/
Questions: “What tools can audit a startup idea and give me an investor-readiness score?” · “Best AI tools to validate a startup idea using real market data like Google Trends and Reddit?”
- evalyze.aiMedia and blogs
Cited in 2 answers that named IdeaProof, Gust and not you.
Questions: “What tool can score my startup the way different investors would see it?” · “Is there a tool that matches my startup with best-fit investors and generates a pitch teaser?”
Technical audit
Core Web Vitals & performance · mobile
Core Web Vitals
Lighthouse scores
SERP Presence
Google top-10 & Bing index — where AI search pulls its citations from
Google showed an AI Overview for 5 of 5 tested queries, and cited you in 0.
"How do I know if my startup idea is worth pursuing before I quit my job?"
Top ranking: google.com · google.com · www.facebook.com
"I have too many startup ideas, how can I objectively decide which one to build first?"
Top ranking: www.reddit.com · google.com · google.com
"How can I stop wasting months building a product nobody wants?"
Top ranking: google.com · www.indiehackers.com · www.linkedin.com
"What tools can audit a startup idea and give me an investor-readiness score?"
Top ranking: google.com · siift.ai · www.fundability.org.uk
"Is there an MCP server for startup idea validation that works with Claude?"
Top ranking: medium.com · google.com · google.com
AI Identity Details
Files and signals that help AI systems understand your business
AI crawler access (robots.txt)
25/25Visibility-critical (retrieval & citation)
These bots fetch and cite your pages in AI answers. Blocking them removes you from AI search results.
Powers Bing search — the index behind ChatGPT browsing and Copilot answers.
Closed, probably on purpose, and not scored. Check only if public pages live here: /tv/callback
Not counted against you (private, app or empty paths): /api/, /tv/api/
Builds the ChatGPT Search index.
Closed, probably on purpose, and not scored. Check only if public pages live here: /tv/callback
Not counted against you (private, app or empty paths): /api/, /tv/api/
Indexes content for Perplexity answers.
Closed, probably on purpose, and not scored. Check only if public pages live here: /tv/callback
Not counted against you (private, app or empty paths): /api/, /tv/api/
Fetches pages live when ChatGPT users open or cite links.
Closed, probably on purpose, and not scored. Check only if public pages live here: /tv/callback
Not counted against you (private, app or empty paths): /api/, /tv/api/
Builds the Claude search index.
Closed, probably on purpose, and not scored. Check only if public pages live here: /tv/callback
Not counted against you (private, app or empty paths): /api/, /tv/api/
Fetches pages live on behalf of Perplexity users.
Closed, probably on purpose, and not scored. Check only if public pages live here: /tv/callback
Not counted against you (private, app or empty paths): /api/, /tv/api/
Fetches pages live when Claude users open or cite links.
Closed, probably on purpose, and not scored. Check only if public pages live here: /tv/callback
Not counted against you (private, app or empty paths): /api/, /tv/api/
Training crawlers (we recommend open)
These robots collect pages to train future models, and assistants also answer from what they learned. Keeping them open is the safe default; blocking them is a legitimate choice that this score does not count. Blocking Google-Extended removes the site from the Gemini app; AI Overviews are not affected.
Your homepage as robots get it
We opened your homepage once without a robot's name and once with the name of each search and assistant robot. Not scored.
- Bingbot: opens
- OAI-SearchBot: opens
- ChatGPT-User: opens
- Claude-SearchBot: opens
- Claude-User: opens
- PerplexityBot: opens
- Perplexity-User: opens
- YandexBot: opens
Emerging AI standards
ExplorerNot scored4/10 presentThese files are proposed conventions that major AI crawlers do not read yet. Adopting them is zero-risk future-proofing, but they do not affect your score today.
Name inconsistencies across these files
- Brand name is inconsistent across files
Social & AI preview tags
Technical SEO
Recommendations
- 🔴
Review and align details across all AI identity files.
- 🟢
Most emerging AI-identity files (ai.json, ai.txt, llms.txt, …) are missing. They are not scored — major AI crawlers do not read them yet — but adopting them is zero-risk future-proofing.
Suggested competitors
How visible is YOUR site to AI?
Run the same free analysis: AI citations, identity files, technical health — in about a minute.
Analyze my site — freeCookies
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.