Skip to content
JustClaw-It logo

JustClaw-It MCP server

Which MCP servers are JustClaw-It's own, from the official registry and from asking its own domain, whether they answer, and what they offer. A program checked each of these, nobody copied them from a product page.

read 2026-10-29

← Back to JustClaw-It

Whose server it is
  • Registry namecom.it.justclaw/justclaw-itverified in the MCP registry

The registry name sits under justclaw.it.com. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.

When we asked itchecked 2026-10-29
  • Staterequires sign-inchecked 2026-10-29

On 2026-10-29 the server answered and asked for a sign-in with a JustClaw-It account (OAuth). It shows its tool list only to signed-in users, so we list none here.

Should an agent connect itNot proven either way yet
  • Its tools do every use case we checked: search licence-cleared components for a specific coding task; pull full source with its licence header and repo link.
  • Checked on 5 of the 7 days it takes to judge reliability.

Once connected

  • For "search licence-cleared components for a specific coding task", the likely first call is search_components.
  • For "pull full source with its licence header and repo link", the likely first call is get_component.
  • Parameters are untyped or undescribed in 7 of 9 tools: check arguments before calling.

Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.

Measured dailydaily checks: 5, the first on 2026-10-29
  • INITE MCP scoreafter a weeka score needs 7 daily checks: 5 so far
  • What an agent can do with it2 of 2 use cases
  • Answeredmeasuring5 of the 7 daily checks it takes to print a share
  • Median first answer539 ms
  • Space in an agent's context≈ 2,073 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (9), which an agent carries on every turn
  • Tool definitionsB · 87 of 100
  • Typed results9 of 9 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once
  • Parameters without a description: in 7 of 9

What an agent can do with it

  • can do · search licence-cleared components for a specific coding task
  • can do · pull full source with its licence header and repo link
  • not sure · adapt a retrieved webhook handler to an existing app

Each of the product's use cases, put to Jev against this server's tool list: can an agent do it with these tools?

Worth a look

None of the five warning signs in these definitions.

A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (25%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%), use (10%) and how readily a client connects (10%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →

How to connect

Add the server to your MCP client config. Claude Desktop, Cursor and most other clients read this shape:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "justclaw-it": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://justclaw.it.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Add it

Claude Code, in a terminal

claude mcp add --transport http justclaw https://justclaw.it.com/mcp

Add to CursorAdd to VS Code

claude.ai, ChatGPT and other clients: add https://justclaw.it.com/mcp as a custom connector in the settings.

The first time it connects, the client opens a JustClaw-It sign-in.

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.