MOCO
From ≈ $17/user/moActively maintained
≈ 3kvisits/mo
Little sign of use · estimate, read Oct 13, 2026
- For
- Service providers, consultancies and agencies running project-based work, mainly in Germany, Switzerland and Austria
- Price
- From ≈ $17/user/mo€15 · pricing page, read Oct 16, 2026Trial & discounts: 30-day free trial
- Activity
- Actively maintainedsite updated 10 days ago
- Company
- Switzerland GmbH · since 2014terms of service · per their site
- Runs as
- API
- Used for
- Track time against client projects
- Bill clients from logged hours
- Review project reports as work happens
- Used more than 84% of the 494 tools on its shelfINITE Atlas →
- On the web since 2014, older than 94% of its shelfINITE Atlas
- Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
- Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsmocoapp.com ↗
- Founded2014per their site ↗
- Domain since2010domain registered
- Run bySwitzerland GmbHterms of service ↗
- Certifications they stateGDPRtrust center ↗
- Trust centertheir owntrust center ↗
- Security contactsecurity.txt
These are MOCO's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.
- MCP servercom.mocoapp.api/mcpverified in the MCP registry
- Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-16
- Address to connectapi.mocoapp.com/mcp
- API docsmocoapp.com/en/integrations/34-moco-apithe vendor's page ↗
- MCP docsmocoapp.com/en/features/25-general/content/137-aithe vendor's page ↗
This card as JSON, for your agent →
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since
- #1
Rize
Automatically tracks time spent on work by client and project, displaying team utilization and profitability without timers or screenshots.
94kActiveFrom $9.99/mo2020 - #2
Scopewise
Generates project estimates, specifications, and quotes for IT work from scope descriptions.
65Maintained - #3
Timvora
Tracks work hours, leave, and project capacity with natural language queries to analyze timesheet data.
1ActiveFrom ≈ $16/mo - #4
Novasis AI
Manages customers, projects, tasks, and files in one workspace with an AI assistant for record updates and queries.
EmergingActiveFrom $80/mo - #5
ComposerMCP · open
Plans and runs multi-step web research jobs across search, page extraction and on-chain data for one quoted USDC price.
Little sign of use - #6
Teamwork.com Project Management & Resource Management AppMCP · sign-in
Tracks time, budgets and staffing across client work, showing live margin per project for professional services firms.
467kActive2007
Not it? Say what you need
betaThree tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.
No notes yet. What do you use MOCO for?
Sign in to leave a noteWhat is MOCO?
Tracks project time, bills clients and plans resources in one web app for agencies and consultancies. It is listed in the Atlas under Productivity and made by Switzerland GmbH.
Who is MOCO for?
Service providers, consultancies and agencies running project-based work, mainly in Germany, Switzerland and Austria
How much does MOCO cost?
Paid plans start at ≈ $17/user/mo (€15/user/mo), per MOCO's pricing page on 2026-10-16.
Is MOCO free?
No. Its pricing page showed no free plan on 2026-10-16.
Do people use MOCO?
Little sign of use: ≈ 3k visits/mo · estimate, 2026-10.
Is MOCO still maintained?
Actively maintained: site updated 10 days ago.
Who owns MOCO?
MOCO is run by Switzerland GmbH, per its terms of service (2026-10-16).
Is MOCO safe?
We do not audit vendors. What MOCO publishes, read 2026-10-16: GDPR stated on its trust center.
Does MOCO have a free trial?
Yes, a 30-day free trial, per its pricing page (2026-10-16).
What are alternatives to MOCO?
In Productivity, by use: Rize, Scopewise, Timvora, Novasis AI, Composer, Teamwork.com Project Management & Resource Management App.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.