Skip to content
NeuronSearchLab logo

NeuronSearchLab

Sits above a recommender, letting teams train, compare, promote and roll back models behind one stable API.

Free plan · From ≈ $200/moActively maintained

At a glanceswept Oct 13, 2026

≈ 2visits/mo

Little sign of use · estimate, read Oct 13, 2026

For
Product teams in media, commerce and publishing who run recommendations inside their own sites and apps
Price
Free plan · From ≈ $200/mo£150 · pricing page, read Oct 20, 2026
Activity
Actively maintainedsite updated 9 days ago
Runs as
API
Used for
  • compare recommendation models on your own historical data
  • promote a new model only after it beats the current one
  • explain why a given item was recommended to a user
read off neuronsearchlab.com on Oct 20, 2026
Worth knowingcomputed from what we read · each with its source
  • On the web since 2024, older than 68% of its shelfINITE Atlas
  • Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
  • Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsneuronsearchlab.com ↗
Pricingpricing page, read Oct 20, 2026

Free plan · From ≈ $200/mo

£150

Your datawhat they publish, each line with its page · read Oct 20, 2026

“We do not use Site-collected data to train recommendation models or algorithmic systems.”

privacy policy ↗

These are NeuronSearchLab's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.

How a program reaches itfound, not claimed · read Oct 20, 2026
  • MCP servercom.neuronsearchlab/mcpverified in the MCP registry
  • Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-20
  • Address to connectconsole.neuronsearchlab.com/api/mcp
  • Status pageall systems operationalneuronsearchlab.statuspage.io ↗

MCP server details →

This card as JSON, for your agent →

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

Alternatives in Productivityby use, among tools still maintained

Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since

Compare NeuronSearchLab with

Pick up to two.

All 10 alternatives to NeuronSearchLab →

All Productivity tools →

Not it? Say what you need

beta

Three tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.

From people who use itnot part of the reading

No notes yet. What do you use NeuronSearchLab for?

Sign in to leave a note
Questions this page answers
  • What is NeuronSearchLab?

    Sits above a recommender, letting teams train, compare, promote and roll back models behind one stable API. It is listed in the Atlas under Productivity.

  • Who is NeuronSearchLab for?

    Product teams in media, commerce and publishing who run recommendations inside their own sites and apps

  • How much does NeuronSearchLab cost?

    NeuronSearchLab has a free plan; paid plans start at ≈ $200/mo (£150/mo), per its pricing page on 2026-10-20.

  • Is NeuronSearchLab free?

    Yes, NeuronSearchLab has a free plan, per its pricing page on 2026-10-20.

  • Do people use NeuronSearchLab?

    Little sign of use: ≈ 2 visits/mo · estimate, 2026-10.

  • Is NeuronSearchLab still maintained?

    Actively maintained: site updated 9 days ago.

  • Does NeuronSearchLab train AI on your data?

    No, per its privacy policy (2026-10-20): “We do not use Site-collected data to train recommendation models or algorithmic systems.”

  • Is NeuronSearchLab safe?

    We do not audit vendors. What NeuronSearchLab publishes, read 2026-10-20: GDPR, CCPA stated on its privacy policy; on training with your data, “We do not use Site-collected data to train recommendation models or algorithmic systems.”.

  • Does NeuronSearchLab give refunds?

    In its own words (terms of service, 2026-10-20): “Fees are non-refundable except where required by law or stated otherwise in a separate agreement.”

  • What are alternatives to NeuronSearchLab?

    In Productivity, by use: EXEED AI, FolioFact, Gorse, Audora, Secret Chat AI, Conversational AI Fluency Assessment.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.

How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk