
InvoiceVerify MCP server
Which MCP servers are InvoiceVerify's own, from the official registry and from asking its own domain, whether they answer, and what they offer. A program checked each of these, nobody copied them from a product page.
read 2026-10-30
- Registry nameapp.lovable.peppol-invoice-compass/invoiceverifyverified in the MCP registry
The registry name sits under peppol-invoice-compass.lovable.app. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.
- Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-30
- Tools9
- Server calls itselfinvoiceverify
- Server version1.2.1
- Protocol version2025-06-18
On 2026-10-30 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 111 ms.
- Its tools do every use case we checked: Validate invoice XML against EN 16931 and Peppol rules; Rebuild a non-compliant invoice as valid Peppol UBL.
- Checked on 4 of the 7 days it takes to judge reliability.
Once connected
- For "Validate invoice XML against EN 16931 and Peppol rules", the likely first call is validate_invoice.
Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.
- INITE MCP scoreafter a weeka score needs 7 daily checks: 4 so far
- What an agent can do with it2 of 2 use cases
- Answeredmeasuring4 of the 7 daily checks it takes to print a share
- Median first answer1789 ms
- Space in an agent's context≈ 1,774 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (9), which an agent carries on every turn
- Tool definitionsA · 100 of 100
- Typed results0 of 9 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once
- Every tool passes all six checks.
What an agent can do with it
- can do · Validate invoice XML against EN 16931 and Peppol rules
- not sure · Find clients registered under only one of their Peppol IDs
- can do · Rebuild a non-compliant invoice as valid Peppol UBL
Each of the product's use cases, put to Jev against this server's tool list: can an agent do it with these tools?
Worth a look
None of the five warning signs in these definitions.
A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (25%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%), use (10%) and how readily a client connects (10%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →
check_peppol_receivabilityFree, no sign-in needed: check whether one Belgian company can receive Peppol e-invoices under each of its two Belgian Peppol IDs — 0208 (enterprise/KBO-BCE number) and 9925 (VAT number). Returns receivable under both, only 0208, only…
validate_invoiceValidate a UBL 2.1, Peppol BIS Billing 3.0, XRechnung or CII / Factur-X XML invoice against EN 16931 and Peppol rules; returns pass/fail with rule IDs, line numbers and fixes. Uses one metered call. Requires an InvoiceVerify account…
generate_invoiceCreate a Peppol BIS 3 UBL, XRechnung (UBL or CII) or Factur-X/ZUGFeRD CII XML invoice from structured invoice data, with totals and VAT computed and the result validated. Uses one metered call. Requires an InvoiceVerify account (OAuth…
convert_invoiceConvert an existing UBL or CII / Factur-X invoice XML into Peppol BIS 3 UBL, XRechnung UBL, XRechnung CII or Factur-X CII, and validate the result. Uses one metered call. Requires an InvoiceVerify account (OAuth sign-in).
parse_invoiceRead a UBL or CII / Factur-X invoice XML into structured JSON (parties, lines, VAT, totals, payment) for booking or reconciliation. Uses one metered call. Requires an InvoiceVerify account (OAuth sign-in).
lookup_peppol_participantCheck whether a company can receive Peppol e-invoices: give a VAT number, company number (KBO/BCE, KvK, SIREN/SIRET), GLN or Peppol ID and it checks every relevant scheme (e.g. Belgian 0208 and 9925) in the live Peppol SML/SMP, lists…
check_belgian_peppol_listCheck up to 25 Belgian companies (enterprise or VAT numbers) for Peppol receivability under both Belgian IDs — 0208 (enterprise number) and 9925 (VAT number). Returns per company: receivable under both, only 0208, only 9925, neither, or…
explain_ruleExplain an EN 16931, Peppol or XRechnung business rule (e.g. BR-CO-15, PEPPOL-EN16931-R003) in plain English, Dutch or French, with typical causes and fix steps. Free. Requires an InvoiceVerify account (OAuth sign-in).
get_usageShow this month's metered calls, the included allowance, remaining call-pack credits and the reset date for the signed-in account. Free. Requires an InvoiceVerify account (OAuth sign-in).
How to connect
Add the server to your MCP client config. Claude Desktop, Cursor and most other clients read this shape:
{
"mcpServers": {
"invoiceverify": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://peppol-invoice-compass.lovable.app/mcp"
}
}
}Add it
Claude Code, in a terminal
claude mcp add --transport http peppol-invoice-compass https://peppol-invoice-compass.lovable.app/mcpclaude.ai, ChatGPT and other clients: add https://peppol-invoice-compass.lovable.app/mcp as a custom connector in the settings.
OpenAPI spec
9 paths, read 2026-10-30. Open the spec ↗
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Cookies
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.