
RangerCheck MCP server
Which servers in the official MCP registry are RangerCheck's own, whether they answer, and what they offer. A program checked each of these, nobody copied them from a product page.
read 2026-10-21
- Registry namecom.rangercheck/security-toolsverified in the MCP registry
The registry name sits under rangercheck.com. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.
- Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-21
- Tools1
- Server calls itselfrangercheck
- Server version1.0.0
- Protocol version2025-06-18
On 2026-10-21 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 216 ms.
- Whether its tools do the product's job has not been judged yet.
- Checked on 6 of the 7 days it takes to judge reliability.
Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.
- INITE MCP scoreafter a weeka score needs 7 daily checks: 6 so far
- Answeredmeasuring6 of the 7 daily checks it takes to print a share
- Median first answer211 ms
- Space in an agent's context≈ 184 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (1), which an agent carries on every turn
- Tool definitionsB · 83 of 100
- Typed results0 of 1 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once
- Not saying whether it only reads or can destroy: 1 of 1
What an agent can do with it
- not sure · find API keys and secrets exposed in front-end code
- not sure · spot public source maps that reveal app structure
- not sure · check database rules and security headers for gaps
Each of the product's use cases, put to Jev against this server's tool list: can an agent do it with these tools?
Worth a look
None of the five warning signs in these definitions.
A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (30%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%) and use (15%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →
scan_securityRun a free front-end security check on any website and get a letter grade (A to F) plus specific findings. Answers questions like 'is example.com leaking API keys or secrets in its front-end code', 'does this site expose a…
How to connect
Add the server to your MCP client config. Claude Desktop, Cursor and most other clients read this shape:
{
"mcpServers": {
"security-tools": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://rangercheck.com/api/mcp"
}
}
}Add it
Claude Code, in a terminal
claude mcp add --transport http rangercheck https://rangercheck.com/api/mcpclaude.ai, ChatGPT and other clients: add https://rangercheck.com/api/mcp as a custom connector in the settings.
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Cookies
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.