
Reality Graph MCP server
Which servers in the official MCP registry are Reality Graph's own, whether they answer, and what they offer. A program checked each of these, nobody copied them from a product page.
read 2026-10-21
- Registry namedev.realitygraph/verification-toolsverified in the MCP registry
The registry name sits under realitygraph.dev. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.
- Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-21
- Tools10
- Server calls itselfreality-graph-verification-tools
- Server version2.0.0
- Protocol version2025-06-18
On 2026-10-21 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 177 ms.
- Whether its tools do the product's job has not been judged yet.
- Checked on 2 of the 7 days it takes to judge reliability.
Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.
- INITE MCP scoreafter a weeka score needs 7 daily checks: 2 so far
- Answeredmeasuring2 of the 7 daily checks it takes to print a share
- Median first answer567 ms
- Space in an agent's context≈ 3,272 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (10), which an agent carries on every turn
- Tool definitionsA · 97 of 100
- Typed results2 of 10 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once
- Parameters without a description: in 2 of 10
Worth a look
None of the five warning signs in these definitions.
A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (30%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%) and use (15%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →
check_verification_debtEstimate a software team's verification debt from team parameters. Computes the four published metrics (generation-to-verification ratio, review depth, unverified-merge rate, two-week churn) and an annual cost estimate, with the full…
lint_task_specCheck whether a free-text work order for an AI coding agent is verifiable BEFORE handing it over. Heuristic, deterministic lint of the task's form against the four building blocks of a checkable task (goal, boundaries, acceptance…
get_task_contract_templateReturns Reality Graph's free fill-in template (v0) for a verifiable task contract: goal, non-goals, boundaries (may change / must not change / forbidden), 3-7 yes/no acceptance criteria, validation plan, expected evidence, assumptions…
validate_task_contractDeterministically validates a FILLED task contract (the JSON structure from get_task_contract_template): completeness of goal/non-goals/boundaries, decidability of each acceptance criterion (vague words, missing measurable markers)…
get_verification_report_templateReturns the free fill-in template (v0) for a verification report — the artifact you write right after an AI-assisted run: task recap, files changed AND files confirmed untouched, validation results per acceptance criterion (not authored…
searchFull-text search over the Reality Graph knowledge base on AI coding verification: 40+ glossary definitions, 700+ FAQ answers, sourced statistics, and article summaries on verification debt, AI code review, spec-vs-implementation checking…
fetchFetch a document from the Reality Graph knowledge base by id (as returned by search, e.g. '/verification-debt') or by full realitygraph.dev URL. Returns the document's summary, definitions, key facts, FAQ, and sources as text, plus the…
plan_change_verificationTurn explicit change characteristics into a risk tier, required automated checks, manual scenarios, evidence, release blockers, role handoff, and canonical Reality Graph guidance. Use before implementation or review. It does not inspect…
check_release_readinessReturn GO, CONDITIONAL, or NO_GO from supplied acceptance-criterion results, check evidence, rollback, monitoring, limitations, and independent review. The verdict is deliberately based only on supplied evidence; this tool does not…
calculate_verification_capacityCalculate weekly review demand, utilization, capacity gap, supported change throughput, and changes lacking evidence from measured team inputs. No cost model, benchmark, or hidden industry assumption is applied; the output shows the…
How to connect
Add the server to your MCP client config. Claude Desktop, Cursor and most other clients read this shape:
{
"mcpServers": {
"verification-tools": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://realitygraph.dev/api/mcp"
}
}
}Add it
Claude Code, in a terminal
claude mcp add --transport http realitygraph https://realitygraph.dev/api/mcpclaude.ai, ChatGPT and other clients: add https://realitygraph.dev/api/mcp as a custom connector in the settings.
Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.
Cookies
Before we count this visit
Analytics and ad measurement tell us which pages and which of our ads do their job: Google Analytics and Google Ads, the Meta pixel, Yandex Metrica, and one first-party id of our own. Nothing is stored until you answer, and declining changes nothing about the site.