Skip to content
IT連携マップ logo

IT連携マップ MCP server

Which MCP servers are IT連携マップ's own, from the official registry and from asking its own domain, whether they answer, and what they offer. A program checked each of these, nobody copied them from a product page.

read 2026-10-26

← Back to IT連携マップ

Whose server it is
  • Registry namejp.renkeimap/renkeimap-infoverified in the MCP registry

The registry name sits under renkeimap.jp. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.

When we asked itchecked 2026-10-26
  • Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-26
  • Tools10
  • Server calls itselfrenkeimap-info
  • Server version0.1.0
  • Protocol version2025-06-18

On 2026-10-26 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 161 ms.

Should an agent connect itNot proven either way yet
  • Whether its tools do the product's job has not been judged yet.
  • Checked on 2 of the 7 days it takes to judge reliability.

Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.

Measured dailydaily checks: 2, the first on 2026-10-26
  • INITE MCP scoreafter a weeka score needs 7 daily checks: 2 so far
  • Answeredmeasuring2 of the 7 daily checks it takes to print a share
  • Median first answer759 ms
  • Space in an agent's context≈ 1,400 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (10), which an agent carries on every turn
  • Tool definitionsA · 98 of 100
  • Typed results0 of 10 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once
  • Parameters without a description: in 1 of 10

What an agent can do with it

  • not sure · connect kintone and freee through their APIs
  • not sure · sync kintone records with Excel
  • not sure · link Salesforce and HubSpot data

Each of the product's use cases, put to Jev against this server's tool list: can an agent do it with these tools?

Worth a look

None of the five warning signs in these definitions.

A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (25%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%), use (10%) and how readily a client connects (10%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →

Tools it offers10 tools · read 2026-10-26
  • renkeimap_plan

    One call to connect or move data between two systems: route states (API/CSV/screen) + legend, each side's best official route (vendor MCP URL verbatim — never one found by search — or API issuing), human steps, your CLI's add line (pass…

  • renkeimap_find_system

    Search published systems, tools (iPaaS・RPA・ChatAI…) and guides by name / vendor / category / kind word; has= keeps those /compare marks positive. ≤10 each.

  • renkeimap_system_facts

    First-hand, survey-dated facts about one system (auth method, rate limits, CSV surfaces, pricing pages — tags + editorial summaries with sources). Every response carries a citation line; when you use these facts in an answer, cite it (出典…

  • renkeimap_pair

    Whether and how two systems can exchange data: per-method verdicts (official API / CSV / screen-fill) measured from public primary sources, plus measured field-name overlap when available. Honest by design: an unmeasured pair says so…

  • renkeimap_connect

    Routes INTO one system, most stable first: (1) the vendor's official MCP server — URL/auth/local command verbatim, with source and date (never a URL found by search); (2) official API key or OAuth issuing; (3) file/screen…

  • renkeimap_compare

    Side-by-side comparison of 2-5 published systems/tools on the same ledger items (API, contract, price, rate limit, data location, exit, security…). Each cell = editorial tags + one-line lead + source URL + survey date; optional ◎○△× marks…

  • renkeimap_status

    Status of one system observed EXTERNALLY by IT連携マップ (third party, not the vendor): conclusion, vendor notices (verbatim title+URL), editor's check, 1h user reports, same-vendor systems' own states, bar, 7 days, status page url (link it)…

  • renkeimap_brief

    One round trip = renkeimap_find_system + renkeimap_status + renkeimap_hintpack. Give a slug or the system name as the user wrote it; same shapes as the single tools. Use first in support conversations. ★Always relay the included…

  • renkeimap_status_history

    Vendor-published incident history and announced maintenance for one system, checked word for word (the vendor's own records, not our observation): counts, monthly frequency, durations (where the vendor gave an end), usual weekdays/hours…

  • renkeimap_hintpack

    Static public knowledge for one system: what its vendor error messages mean, official support/contact URLs, login method shape. Sourced from public vendor pages (entries carry sources). No user data. Cite when used.

How to connect

Add the server to your MCP client config. Claude Desktop, Cursor and most other clients read this shape:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "renkeimap-info": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://renkeimap.jp/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Add it

Claude Code, in a terminal

claude mcp add --transport http renkeimap https://renkeimap.jp/mcp

Add to CursorAdd to VS Code

claude.ai, ChatGPT and other clients: add https://renkeimap.jp/mcp as a custom connector in the settings.

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.