SemanticGuard
Caches LLM API responses and audits tool calls to reduce costs and enforce policies.
31 linking domains
Emerging
- For
- Teams building AI agents who want to reduce LLM API costs and audit tool calls.
- Price
- Free plan · From $49/mopricing page, read 2026-09-19
- Activity
- Actively maintainednothing dated on the site
- Company
- founding year not on record
- Runs as
- APISDK
- Cache LLM responses across multiple requests and models
- Audit and enforce policies on agent tool calls
- Measure cost savings before enabling caching
- #5
PostHog
Ingests product data and runs AI agents to investigate issues and recommend product improvements.
24.7knot readFree plan2020 - #8
Framer
Design and build websites with AI agents that generate, refine, and manage content directly on canvas.
245knot readFrom $10/mo - #18
Kiro
Converts prompts into executable specifications and implements code with parallel agents that validate correctness.
32.7kActiveFrom $20/user/mo - #21
OpenClaw
Open source AI assistant that manages email, calendar, and tasks from chat apps without subscriptions.
182kActive— - #24
Fusion
Collaborative platform for teams to build software and web experiences with AI agents and visual editing.
158kMaintained— - #25
Devin
Executes software engineering tasks including code migrations, bug fixes, testing, and documentation generation across multiple repositories.
30.6kActiveFrom $20/mo
What is SemanticGuard?
Caches LLM API responses and audits tool calls to reduce costs and enforce policies.
Who is SemanticGuard for?
Teams building AI agents who want to reduce LLM API costs and audit tool calls.
How much does SemanticGuard cost?
SemanticGuard has a free plan; paid plans start at $49/mo, per its pricing page on 2026-09-19.
Do people use SemanticGuard?
Emerging.
Is SemanticGuard still maintained?
Actively maintained.
What are alternatives to SemanticGuard?
In Developer tools, by use: PostHog, Framer, Kiro, OpenClaw, Fusion, Devin.
How we read a tool
No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.
- Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
- Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
- Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
- The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one row at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.
How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.