Skip to content
VoiceDock logo

VoiceDock

Runs voice assistants on phone lines, wiring SIP trunks, speech-to-text, language models and text-to-speech into one orchestrated call layer.

From ≈ $0.08 per useActively maintained

At a glanceswept Oct 21, 2026

not read yet

Use

For
teams running voice agents on real phone lines who want engineers working alongside them
Price
From ≈ $0.08 per use€0.07 · pricing page, read Oct 24, 2026
Activity
Actively maintainedrelease 8 days ago · site updated 13 days ago
Company
since 2023per their site
Runs as
API
Used for
  • move or book appointments during inbound phone calls
  • place outbound calls from a backend through the API
  • monitor and steer live calls from a dashboard
read off voicedock.ai on Oct 24, 2026
Worth knowingcomputed from what we read · each with its source
  • On the web since 2023, older than 80% of its shelfINITE Atlas
  • Has an MCP server (1 in the registry)public registry →
  • Publishes llms.txt, a file written for AI assistantsvoicedock.ai ↗
Pricingpricing page, read Oct 24, 2026
The companyeach fact with its source · read Oct 24, 2026
Your datawhat they publish, each line with its page · read Oct 24, 2026

“Their terms state they do not train generally available models on non-public materials, except for feedback and content flagged for trust and safety review.”

trust center ↗

These are VoiceDock's own statements, read from its pages. We did not audit them. A line that is missing was not found on the pages we read; it does not mean the practice is absent.

How a program reaches itfound, not claimed · read Oct 24, 2026
  • MCP serverai.voicedock/voicedockverified in the MCP registry
  • Stateanswers, requires sign-inchecked 2026-10-24
  • Address to connectmcp.hmsovereign.com/mcp
  • API docsvoicedock.ai/en/developersthe vendor's page ↗

MCP server details →

This card as JSON, for your agent →

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.

Alternatives in Voiceby use, among tools still maintained

Figure and bar: visits/mo, estimate · year: online since

Compare VoiceDock with

Pick up to two.

All 10 alternatives to VoiceDock →

All Voice tools →

Not it? Say what you need

beta

Three tools from the Atlas for the job you describe, each with what fits and what does not.

From people who use itnot part of the reading

No notes yet. What do you use VoiceDock for?

Sign in to leave a note
Questions this page answers
  • What is VoiceDock?

    Runs voice assistants on phone lines, wiring SIP trunks, speech-to-text, language models and text-to-speech into one orchestrated call layer. It is listed in the Atlas under Voice.

  • Who is VoiceDock for?

    teams running voice agents on real phone lines who want engineers working alongside them

  • How much does VoiceDock cost?

    Paid plans start at ≈ $0.08 per use (€0.07 per use), per VoiceDock's pricing page on 2026-10-24.

  • Is VoiceDock free?

    No. Its pricing page showed no free plan on 2026-10-24.

  • Do people use VoiceDock?

    Little sign of use.

  • Is VoiceDock still maintained?

    Actively maintained: release 8 days ago · site updated 13 days ago.

  • Does VoiceDock train AI on your data?

    Only with your consent or on some plans, per its trust center (2026-10-24): “Their terms state they do not train generally available models on non-public materials, except for feedback and content flagged for trust and safety review.”

  • Is VoiceDock safe?

    We do not audit vendors. What VoiceDock publishes, read 2026-10-24: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, ISO 27701, PCI DSS stated on its trust center; on training with your data, “Their terms state they do not train generally available models on non-public materials, except for feedback and content flagged for trust and safety review.”.

  • What are alternatives to VoiceDock?

    In Voice, by use: Goodcall, Retell AI, Vapi, Deepgram, Hume EVI 2, Synthflow.

How we read a tool

No votes, no reviews, no vendor claims. Every week a crawler reads each tool's own site and a few public registries, and the words on the card are bands over what it read.

  • Use: visits to the site (estimated), installs from npm and PyPI, presence in Chrome's usage report.
  • Activity: the newest release on GitHub, npm or PyPI; the newest dated page on the site; open roles on a public jobs board.
  • Price: the vendor's own pricing page, read with the date. A figure is printed only when it is on that page.
  • The line and the use cases are written by us from the homepage, one tool at a time, and refused when they repeat the vendor's marketing.

How AI assistants read each site — the reading vendors ask us about — is on each tool's own visibility page.

How we read every tool → · By INITE Atlas Desk