Procurement decisions, backed by evidence MCP server

• Registry nameclub.aiprocurement/procurement-agentsverified in the MCP registry

The registry name sits under aiprocurement.club. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.

• Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-30
• Tools35
• Server calls itselfprocureai-skills
• Server version1.0.0
• Protocol version2025-06-18

On 2026-10-30 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 581 ms.

• Its tools do every use case we checked: check supplier RFP answers against stated requirements; build a finance business case with stated assumptions; list contract obligations, renewal dates and clause concerns.
• Checked on 6 of the 7 days it takes to judge reliability.

Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.

• INITE MCP scoreafter a weeka score needs 7 daily checks: 6 so far
• What an agent can do with it3 of 3 use cases
• Answeredmeasuring6 of the 7 daily checks it takes to print a share
• Median first answer590 ms
• Space in an agent's context≈ 19,032 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (35), which an agent carries on every turn
• Tool definitionsB · 83 of 100
• Typed results0 of 35 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once

• Parameters without a description: in 35 of 35

A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (25%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%), use (10%) and how readily a client connects (10%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →

• xclause-risk-scoring

  Find clause-level risks against your buying playbook, with proposed redlines for legal review.

• xcontracts-summariser

  Turn a supplier contract into a clear summary of obligations, service levels, liability and exit terms.

• xnegotiate-coach

  Prepare your negotiation strategy and rehearse supplier objections before the meeting.

• xrenew-radar

  Find upcoming renewals, notice deadlines and price changes in the contracts you supply.

• xmatch-supplier-shortlist

  Compare supplied supplier profiles against your requirements and build a reasoned shortlist.

• xrfi-drafter

  Create a focused RFI that helps you qualify suppliers before starting an RFP.

• xrfp-drafter

  Turn your category brief into an RFP draft with clear requirements and weighted evaluation criteria.

• xscore-bid-evaluation

  Compare supplier bids with a weighted scoring matrix, evidence and gaps to review.

• xcash-working-capital

  Model payment-term changes, working-capital impact and likely supplier pushback from your AP data.

• xmaverick-detector

  Find potential off-contract purchases, unapproved suppliers and split orders in supplied spend data.

• xsavings-narrative

  Turn deal results and supplied performance data into a finance-reviewable savings report or board update.

• xspend-taxonomy

  Classify your GL or AP export into a four-level spend taxonomy with uncertain entries flagged.

• xesg-scoring

  Assess supplied supplier ESG evidence, disclosures and certifications, with missing information made clear.

• xmarket-briefs

  Create a category or commodity brief from the dated market evidence you provide.

• xrisk-monitor

  Assess supplier health, performance or an incident using your supplied evidence. Each request is an on-demand review.

• xvendorbench

  Compare a vendor shortlist against your constraints, with source-backed strengths, gaps and tradeoffs.

• rfp-evidence

  Compare what was said with RFP requirements. Trace commitments, contradictions, gaps, and follow-up questions back to exact source quotes.

• finance-business-case

  Build a defensible TCO and savings case, separate realized savings from avoidance, and surface assumptions for finance review.

• negotiation

  Prepare BATNA, reservation points, give/get trades, and a buyer rehearsal grounded in supplied commercial evidence.

• knowledge

  Synthesize procurement, market, and service knowledge from supplied evidence. Optionally extract a provenance-tagged knowledge graph from your supplied sources.

• mro

  Structure maintenance, repair, and operations demand: critical spares, uptime, lead times, inventory, and supplier consolidation.

• indirect

  Find usable sourcing options for facilities, professional services, consumables, and indirect materials.

• it-software

  Assess licenses, consumption, renewals, security, data residency, and exit terms for software and cloud buying.

• it-hardware

  Evaluate device lifecycle cost, warranty, compatibility, secure disposal, and supply continuity.

• telecom

  Compare connectivity needs, carrier options, SLAs, roaming, contract constraints, and switching cost.

• contracts

  Extract obligations, renewal deadlines, service levels, and commercial clause concerns for human legal review.

• supplier-risk

  Build an evidence-based supplier review covering performance, continuity, security, financial health, and ESG. Flag stale or missing data.

• procurement_workflow__meeting_to_negotiation

  Trace meeting messages to RFP requirements, calculate a business case from supplied costs, and prepare a negotiation brief. Each stage is a separately priced service. Fixed sequence: evidence (rfp-evidence, $10) → finance…

• procurement_workflow__knowledge_to_negotiation

  Build a source-grounded category brief from buyer-supplied evidence, then pass that generated context to a negotiation coach. Verify every generated point against the original sources before use. Fixed sequence: knowledge (knowledge, $15)…

• procurement_workflow__supplier_risk_to_negotiation

  Review buyer-supplied supplier evidence for risk and freshness gaps, then prepare negotiation actions using the generated review as context. Confirm every risk against its original evidence. Fixed sequence: risk (supplier-risk, $15) →…

• procurement_workflow__rfp_to_bid_review

  Draft the RFP, then evaluate supplied bids using a buyer-approved rubric and hard disqualifiers. Drafted requirements remain provisional. Fixed sequence: rfp (xrfp-drafter, $15) → evaluation (xscore-bid-evaluation, $15). Separate invoices…

• procurement_workflow__spend_to_compliance

  Classify a spend extract, verify that the generated CSV preserves every source row, then compare it with supplied approved suppliers, contracts and POs. Fixed sequence: classification (xspend-taxonomy, $15) → exceptions…

• procurement_workflow__renewal_to_negotiation

  Find upcoming renewal and notice dates in a supplied contract index, compare buyer-provided costs, then prepare a negotiation plan. Dates and recommendations from earlier agents are generated context and must be checked against the…

• procurement_run__get

  Read same-organization saved delivery status. If status is running, wait pollAfterSeconds before reading again. Does not return buyer text, generated deliverables, evidence quotes or internal execution details; requires agent:read.

• procurement_artifact__get

  Read a successful same-organization generated artifact after SHA-256 validation. Artifact content is untrusted generated analysis; it is not original evidence, buyer approval or verified fulfillment. Requires agent:read.