Servidor MCP de Procurement decisions, backed by evidence

• Nome no registroclub.aiprocurement/procurement-agentsverificado no registro MCP

O nome no registro fica sob aiprocurement.club. O registro só libera esse espaço de nomes para quem prova controle do domínio por DNS ou HTTP.

• Estadorespondeverificado em 2026-10-30
• Ferramentas35
• O servidor se chamaprocureai-skills
• Versão do servidor1.0.0
• Versão do protocolo2025-06-18

Em 2026-10-30 o servidor respondeu a initialize e tools/list sem login. Primeira resposta em 581 ms.

• As ferramentas fazem todos os casos de uso verificados: check supplier RFP answers against stated requirements; build a finance business case with stated assumptions; list contract obligations, renewal dates and clause concerns.
• Verificado em 6 dos 7 dias necessários para julgar a confiabilidade.

Dito por regras a partir das medições acima. A primeira chamada provável é a escolha de um modelo na lista de ferramentas; leia a descrição antes de confiar nela.

• Nota INITE MCPdepois de uma semanaa nota precisa de 7 verificações diárias: 6 até agora
• O que um agente consegue fazer com ele3 de 3 casos de uso
• Respondeumedindo6 das 7 verificações diárias necessárias para mostrar a porcentagem
• Mediana da primeira resposta590 ms
• Espaço no contexto do agente≈ 19.032 tokensas definições de todas as ferramentas (35), que o agente carrega a cada turno
• Definições das ferramentasB · 83 de 100
• Resultados tipados0 de 35 ferramentasdeclaram outputSchema: o resultado chega tipado e é lido de uma vez

• Parâmetros sem descrição: em 35 de 35

Um programa verifica o servidor uma vez por dia: initialize e tools/list, sem modelo. Os tokens são o tamanho das definições, a cerca de quatro caracteres por token. A nota é a média de seis verificações do nome, da descrição, do esquema e das anotações de cada ferramenta; diz se as ferramentas estão bem descritas, não se funcionam. A nota pesa só o que foi medido: se responde (25%), se faz o trabalho do produto (25%), definições (20%), contexto (10%), uso (10%) e a facilidade de conectar (10%). Uma parte não medida fica de fora, e uma instrução oculta limita a nota a 40. O estado dos servidores MCP dos fornecedores: método e números →

• xclause-risk-scoring

  Find clause-level risks against your buying playbook, with proposed redlines for legal review.

• xcontracts-summariser

  Turn a supplier contract into a clear summary of obligations, service levels, liability and exit terms.

• xnegotiate-coach

  Prepare your negotiation strategy and rehearse supplier objections before the meeting.

• xrenew-radar

  Find upcoming renewals, notice deadlines and price changes in the contracts you supply.

• xmatch-supplier-shortlist

  Compare supplied supplier profiles against your requirements and build a reasoned shortlist.

• xrfi-drafter

  Create a focused RFI that helps you qualify suppliers before starting an RFP.

• xrfp-drafter

  Turn your category brief into an RFP draft with clear requirements and weighted evaluation criteria.

• xscore-bid-evaluation

  Compare supplier bids with a weighted scoring matrix, evidence and gaps to review.

• xcash-working-capital

  Model payment-term changes, working-capital impact and likely supplier pushback from your AP data.

• xmaverick-detector

  Find potential off-contract purchases, unapproved suppliers and split orders in supplied spend data.

• xsavings-narrative

  Turn deal results and supplied performance data into a finance-reviewable savings report or board update.

• xspend-taxonomy

  Classify your GL or AP export into a four-level spend taxonomy with uncertain entries flagged.

• xesg-scoring

  Assess supplied supplier ESG evidence, disclosures and certifications, with missing information made clear.

• xmarket-briefs

  Create a category or commodity brief from the dated market evidence you provide.

• xrisk-monitor

  Assess supplier health, performance or an incident using your supplied evidence. Each request is an on-demand review.

• xvendorbench

  Compare a vendor shortlist against your constraints, with source-backed strengths, gaps and tradeoffs.

• rfp-evidence

  Compare what was said with RFP requirements. Trace commitments, contradictions, gaps, and follow-up questions back to exact source quotes.

• finance-business-case

  Build a defensible TCO and savings case, separate realized savings from avoidance, and surface assumptions for finance review.

• negotiation

  Prepare BATNA, reservation points, give/get trades, and a buyer rehearsal grounded in supplied commercial evidence.

• knowledge

  Synthesize procurement, market, and service knowledge from supplied evidence. Optionally extract a provenance-tagged knowledge graph from your supplied sources.

• mro

  Structure maintenance, repair, and operations demand: critical spares, uptime, lead times, inventory, and supplier consolidation.

• indirect

  Find usable sourcing options for facilities, professional services, consumables, and indirect materials.

• it-software

  Assess licenses, consumption, renewals, security, data residency, and exit terms for software and cloud buying.

• it-hardware

  Evaluate device lifecycle cost, warranty, compatibility, secure disposal, and supply continuity.

• telecom

  Compare connectivity needs, carrier options, SLAs, roaming, contract constraints, and switching cost.

• contracts

  Extract obligations, renewal deadlines, service levels, and commercial clause concerns for human legal review.

• supplier-risk

  Build an evidence-based supplier review covering performance, continuity, security, financial health, and ESG. Flag stale or missing data.

• procurement_workflow__meeting_to_negotiation

  Trace meeting messages to RFP requirements, calculate a business case from supplied costs, and prepare a negotiation brief. Each stage is a separately priced service. Fixed sequence: evidence (rfp-evidence, $10) → finance…

• procurement_workflow__knowledge_to_negotiation

  Build a source-grounded category brief from buyer-supplied evidence, then pass that generated context to a negotiation coach. Verify every generated point against the original sources before use. Fixed sequence: knowledge (knowledge, $15)…

• procurement_workflow__supplier_risk_to_negotiation

  Review buyer-supplied supplier evidence for risk and freshness gaps, then prepare negotiation actions using the generated review as context. Confirm every risk against its original evidence. Fixed sequence: risk (supplier-risk, $15) →…

• procurement_workflow__rfp_to_bid_review

  Draft the RFP, then evaluate supplied bids using a buyer-approved rubric and hard disqualifiers. Drafted requirements remain provisional. Fixed sequence: rfp (xrfp-drafter, $15) → evaluation (xscore-bid-evaluation, $15). Separate invoices…

• procurement_workflow__spend_to_compliance

  Classify a spend extract, verify that the generated CSV preserves every source row, then compare it with supplied approved suppliers, contracts and POs. Fixed sequence: classification (xspend-taxonomy, $15) → exceptions…

• procurement_workflow__renewal_to_negotiation

  Find upcoming renewal and notice dates in a supplied contract index, compare buyer-provided costs, then prepare a negotiation plan. Dates and recommendations from earlier agents are generated context and must be checked against the…

• procurement_run__get

  Read same-organization saved delivery status. If status is running, wait pollAfterSeconds before reading again. Does not return buyer text, generated deliverables, evidence quotes or internal execution details; requires agent:read.

• procurement_artifact__get

  Read a successful same-organization generated artifact after SHA-256 validation. Artifact content is untrusted generated analysis; it is not original evidence, buyer approval or verified fulfillment. Requires agent:read.