Skip to content
MacTech Solutions logo

MacTech Solutions MCP server

Which MCP servers are MacTech Solutions's own, from the official registry and from asking its own domain, whether they answer, and what they offer. A program checked each of these, nobody copied them from a product page.

read 2026-10-19

← Back to MacTech Solutions

Whose server it is
  • Registry namecom.mactechsolutionsllc.www/cmmcverified in the MCP registry

The registry name sits under mactechsolutionsllc.com. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.

When we asked itchecked 2026-10-19
  • Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-19
  • Tools13
  • Server calls itselfmactech-cmmc
  • Server version1.2.0
  • Protocol version2025-06-18

On 2026-10-19 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 43 ms.

Should an agent connect itSkip it
  • Its tools do none of the product's use cases we checked: consolidate CUI into one assessable enclave; map NIST 800-171 controls to supporting evidence; monitor subcontractor cyber posture against flow-down clauses.

Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.

Measured dailydaily checks: 10, the first on 2026-10-19
  • INITE MCP score72 of 100answers 100 · does the job 0 · definitions 100 · context 96 · connects 100
  • What an agent can do with it0 of 3 use cases
  • Answered100% of days10 of 10 daily checks
  • Median first answer99 ms
  • Space in an agent's context≈ 3,516 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (13), which an agent carries on every turn
  • Tool definitionsA · 100 of 100
  • Typed results1 of 13 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once
  • Every tool passes all six checks.

What an agent can do with it

  • cannot · consolidate CUI into one assessable enclave
  • cannot · map NIST 800-171 controls to supporting evidence
  • cannot · monitor subcontractor cyber posture against flow-down clauses

Each of the product's use cases, put to Jev against this server's tool list: can an agent do it with these tools?

Worth a look

None of the five warning signs in these definitions.

A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (25%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%), use (10%) and how readily a client connects (10%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →

Tools it offers13 tools · read 2026-10-19
  • lookup_control

    Get one NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirement by number (e.g. "3.5.3"): the full requirement text, its control family, and its exact DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) point weight, including the sliding-scale rules for 3.5.3 (MFA)…

  • list_controls

    List NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirements with their DoD Assessment Methodology (SPRS) weights, optionally filtered by control family name or by point weight (5, 3, or 1). Call this to enumerate the 110 CMMC Level 2 controls, to find all…

  • calculate_sprs_score

    Compute an exact SPRS score per the DoD Assessment Methodology: start at 110 and subtract each unimplemented requirement's Annex A weight (floor −203). Pass the control numbers that are NOT implemented; optionally pass 3.5.3 and/or…

  • get_assessment_objectives

    Get the official NIST SP 800-171A assessment objectives for one NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirement - the exact "Determine if..." objectives a CMMC Level 2 assessor scores, plus the potential assessment methods (what an assessor examines…

  • crosswalk_control

    Map a security control across frameworks: NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 ↔ NIST SP 800-53 (FedRAMP Moderate) ↔ NIST CSF 2.0 ↔ SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria. Accepts an 800-171 number ("3.5.3"), an 800-53 id ("AC-2"), a CSF category ("PR.AA" style…

  • determine_cmmc_level

    Determine which CMMC level (1, 2, or 3) applies to a defense contractor based on the data they handle and the clauses in their contracts, and - separately - which assessment type may actually be designated today. Those are not the same…

  • list_level1_practices

    List all 17 CMMC Level 1 basic safeguarding practices with their FAR 52.204-21 clause citations - the complete requirement set for contractors handling Federal Contract Information (FCI) only. Call this when the user asks what CMMC Level…

  • generate_poam_entries

    Turn a list of unimplemented NIST SP 800-171 controls into structured Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M) entries, and - the part that decides whether the plan is usable - sort them by eligibility under 32 CFR 170.21. Most gaps CANNOT go…

  • check_contract_type_eligibility

    Determine whether a contractor can legally be awarded a given contract type, based on the business systems that type requires. A cost-reimbursement contract may be awarded only if the accounting system is adequate for determining costs…

  • lookup_clause

    Explain what a FAR or DFARS cybersecurity clause obliges a contractor to do: what triggers it, the concrete duties, the reporting deadlines, what it flows down to subcontractors, and which other clauses come with it. Covers 52.204-21…

  • scope_assessment

    Work out which assets fall inside a CMMC assessment boundary, and what each category obliges. Returns the DoD asset categories (CUI Asset, Security Protection Asset, Contractor Risk Managed Asset, Specialized Asset, Out-of-Scope) with how…

  • lookup_rev3_requirement

    Get one NIST SP 800-171 REVISION 3 requirement by its zero-padded number (e.g. "03.01.01"): the requirement statement, its organization-defined parameters, the 800-171A Rev 3 assessment objectives, and whether it was withdrawn. Rev 3 has…

  • crosswalk_revisions

    Explain how NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 and Rev 3 differ, and what happened to a specific requirement between them. Call this when someone is implementing Rev 3 early, holds a Rev 3 citation and needs the Rev 2 obligation, or asks which…

How to connect

Add the server to your MCP client config. Claude Desktop, Cursor and most other clients read this shape:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "cmmc": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.mactechsolutionsllc.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Add it

Claude Code, in a terminal

claude mcp add --transport http mactechsolutionsllc https://www.mactechsolutionsllc.com/api/mcp

Add to CursorAdd to VS Code

claude.ai, ChatGPT and other clients: add https://www.mactechsolutionsllc.com/api/mcp as a custom connector in the settings.

Other servers listed as MacTech Solutions's
  • com.mactechsolutionsllc.www/federal-marketanswers, 7 toolsverified in the MCP registry
  • com.mactechsolutionsllc.www/stiganswers, 4 toolsverified in the MCP registry

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.