Skip to content
Reviewpaper logo

Reviewpaper MCP server

Which MCP servers are Reviewpaper's own, from the official registry and from asking its own domain, whether they answer, and what they offer. A program checked each of these, nobody copied them from a product page.

read 2026-10-27

← Back to Reviewpaper

Whose server it is
  • Registry nameai.reviewpaper/reviewpaperverified in the MCP registry

The registry name sits under reviewpaper.ai. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.

When we asked itchecked 2026-10-27
  • Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-27
  • Tools7
  • Server calls itselfreviewpaper
  • Server version1.0.0
  • Protocol version2025-06-18

On 2026-10-27 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 139 ms.

Should an agent connect itNot proven either way yet
  • Whether its tools do the product's job has not been judged yet.

Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.

Measured dailydaily checks: 7, the first on 2026-10-27
  • INITE MCP score99 of 100answers 100 · definitions 98 · context 100 · connects 100
  • Answered100% of days7 of 7 daily checks
  • Median first answer206 ms
  • Space in an agent's context≈ 1,128 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (7), which an agent carries on every turn
  • Tool definitionsA · 98 of 100
  • Typed results0 of 7 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once
  • Parameters without a description: in 1 of 7

What an agent can do with it

  • not sure · simulate three peer reviews of a paper before submission
  • not sure · draft rebuttals from simulated reviewer comments
  • cannot · rank revision fixes and paste them into a coding assistant

Each of the product's use cases, put to Jev against this server's tool list: can an agent do it with these tools?

Worth a look

None of the five warning signs in these definitions.

A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (25%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%), use (10%) and how readily a client connects (10%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →

Tools it offers7 tools · read 2026-10-27
  • list_venues

    List the 29 ML / NLP / CV / data-mining venues whose reviewer forms reviewpaper.ai models, with the overall score scale, whether the form is official or modeled, and links. Use get_review_form for the full form.

  • get_review_form

    The exact reviewer form for a venue: every field in order with guidance, each score scale with its official labels, the author checklist, the area-chair meta-review, the rough acceptance bar and the venue's LLM policy. Accepts a slug…

  • list_deadlines

    Upcoming paper and abstract deadlines for ~64 ML, CV, NLP, robotics, speech, data-mining and AI conferences, soonest first, in AoE and ISO-8601 UTC. Projected (not yet announced) dates are excluded unless include_estimated is true.

  • get_deadline

    Full timeline for one conference edition: abstract/registration, paper, author response and decision dates (AoE + ISO), plus links to its review form. Accepts 'cvpr-2027', 'CVPR 2027' or just 'CVPR' (next upcoming edition).

  • iclr_acceptance_odds

    Historical ICLR acceptance rate for papers with similar reviewer ratings, from public OpenReview decisions (kernel estimate over past score profiles). Give 3–6 ratings as the reviewers gave them. Not a prediction of any decision.

  • convert_score

    Map an overall review score at one venue to the same position on other venues' scales, keeping its distance from each venue's rough acceptance bar. A heuristic for intuition, not an official equivalence.

  • get_llm_policy

    What a venue allows authors and reviewers to do with LLMs, with the official policy link. Use before advising someone on AI use for a submission or a review.

How to connect

Add the server to your MCP client config. Claude Desktop, Cursor and most other clients read this shape:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "reviewpaper": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://reviewpaper.ai/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Add it

Claude Code, in a terminal

claude mcp add --transport http reviewpaper https://reviewpaper.ai/mcp

Add to CursorAdd to VS Code

claude.ai, ChatGPT and other clients: add https://reviewpaper.ai/mcp as a custom connector in the settings.

Other servers listed as Reviewpaper's
  • ai.reviewpaper/reviewpaper-accountanswers, requires sign-inverified in the MCP registry

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.