An adviser first, a builder second
Most automation advice comes from people paid to build. We measure the process first, name the steps that should be removed rather than automated, and return the fee when the numbers say do not build.
What the engagement covers
Measure the process before quoting a build
Two weeks on the real thing: where the hours go, how many handoffs a case makes, how often it goes wrong. A quote written before that is a guess with a number on it.
Name the steps that should not exist
Automating a step nobody should be doing makes it permanent. The audit separates work that is genuinely required from work that survives because it always has.
Say when an off-the-shelf tool already does it
An app is cheaper than a project. Where a standard tool covers the flow we say so, and we say exactly where it stops being enough.
Put the candidates in order
Which process goes first, what it depends on, and what the second one costs once the first exists. Sequence is most of the saving.
What you get out of it
- ▸A measured weekly cost for the process, not an estimate
- ▸The fee back in full when the honest answer is do not build
- ▸Off-the-shelf options named rather than quietly skipped
- ▸A plan specific enough for your own team to execute without us
Put a number on the process first
Two weeks on one process: the map, a measured weekly cost, and every candidate scored before anything is built. If the arithmetic says do not build, we say so and the fee comes back.
Put a time in the calendarThirty minutes, free. The sprint is what the call is about.
- Fee
- $2,500
- Length
- 1-2 weeks
Refunded in full if we conclude you should not build.