Pakistan Case Law MCP server

• Registry namecom.pakistancaselaw/caselawverified in the MCP registry

The registry name sits under pakistancaselaw.com. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.

• Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-21
• Tools7
• Server calls itselfPakistan Case Law
• Server version1.5.0
• Protocol version2025-06-18

On 2026-10-21 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 307 ms.

• Its tools do search judgments by any word or phrase in the text, but not track new judgments from chosen courts by weekly email.

Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.

• INITE MCP score82 of 100answers 100 · does the job 50 · definitions 83 · context 100 · connects 100
• What an agent can do with it1 of 2 use cases
• Answered100% of days7 of 7 daily checks
• Median first answer316 ms
• Space in an agent's context≈ 2,930 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (7), which an agent carries on every turn
• Tool definitionsB · 83 of 100
• Typed results7 of 7 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once

• Parameters without a description: in 7 of 7

A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (25%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%), use (10%) and how readily a client connects (10%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →

• caselaw_search

  Full-text search of Pakistani judgments (Supreme Court, High Courts, Federal Shariat Court and tribunals, 1970 onward), with optional filters by court, judge, author, law report and year. Ranking follows how lawyers research: nearness to…

• caselaw_search_questions

  Find judgments by the QUESTION they settle, rather than by words they contain. Every judgment summary on this corpus records the questions that judgment actually decides — e.g. "Does delay in lodging the FIR by itself entitle the accused…

• caselaw_lookup_citation

  Find the judgment(s) at an exact law-report citation. Example: journal='PLD', year=1995, page=34 → PLD 1995 Supreme Court 34. Omit page to list everything reported in that journal+year. Returns the same case shape as caselaw_search.

• caselaw_get_case

  Fetch one judgment by id. section='summary' (default) returns metadata + the headnote (plain-language summary, the laws/provisions referred, and keyword tags) — read this first to judge relevance cheaply. section='full' additionally…

• caselaw_get_citations

  Walk the citation graph FORWARD: list the in-corpus cases that THIS judgment cites (the precedents it relied on). Combine with caselaw_get_cited_by to traverse precedent backward and forward until a research question is resolved. Most…

• caselaw_get_cited_by

  Walk the citation graph BACKWARD: list later cases that cite THIS judgment (how it was subsequently treated — followed, distinguished, relied upon). Returns newest first. Most useful on OLDER or landmark judgments: it shows whether the…

• caselaw_most_cited

  List the most-cited (landmark) judgments in the corpus, ranked by how many other cases cite them. A good entry point for the leading authorities on Pakistani law.