Skip to content
Praxikon logo

Praxikon MCP server

Which MCP servers are Praxikon's own, from the official registry and from asking its own domain, whether they answer, and what they offer. A program checked each of these, nobody copied them from a product page.

read 2026-10-19

← Back to Praxikon

Whose server it is
  • Registry namecom.praxikon/praxikonverified in the MCP registry

The registry name sits under praxikon.com. The registry only lets a publisher use that namespace after proving control of the domain through DNS or HTTP.

When we asked itchecked 2026-10-19
  • Stateanswerschecked 2026-10-19
  • Tools9
  • Server calls itselfpraxikon
  • Server version2.3.2
  • Protocol version2025-06-18

On 2026-10-19 the server answered initialize and tools/list without a sign-in. First answer in 175 ms.

Should an agent connect itConnect it
  • Its tools do every use case we checked: check whether a DPIA is required for an AI system; classify an AI system's risk level under the AI Act.

Once connected

  • For "check whether a DPIA is required for an AI system", the likely first call is check_case.
  • For "classify an AI system's risk level under the AI Act", the likely first call is classify_system.

Said by rules from the measurements above. The likely first call is a model's pick from the tool list; read its description before relying on it.

Measured dailydaily checks: 9, the first on 2026-10-19
  • INITE MCP score96 of 100answers 100 · does the job 100 · definitions 98 · context 69 · connects 100
  • What an agent can do with it2 of 2 use cases
  • Answered100% of days9 of 9 daily checks
  • Median first answer962 ms
  • Space in an agent's context≈ 9,549 tokensthe definitions of all its tools (9), which an agent carries on every turn
  • Tool definitionsA · 98 of 100
  • Typed results9 of 9 toolsdeclared outputSchema: results come typed, read once
  • Parameters without a description: in 1 of 9

What an agent can do with it

  • can do · check whether a DPIA is required for an AI system
  • can do · classify an AI system's risk level under the AI Act
  • not sure · draft a transparency notice for chatbot users

Each of the product's use cases, put to Jev against this server's tool list: can an agent do it with these tools?

Worth a look

None of the five warning signs in these definitions.

A program checks the server once a day: initialize and tools/list, no model. Tokens are the definitions' length at about four characters a token. The grade averages six checks of every tool's name, description, schema and annotations; it says how well the tools are described, not whether they work. The score weighs what was measured and nothing else: answering (25%), doing the product's job (25%), definitions (20%), context (10%), use (10%) and how readily a client connects (10%). A part that was not measured is left out, and a hidden instruction caps the score at 40. The state of vendors' MCP servers: method and numbers →

Tools it offers9 tools · read 2026-10-19
  • classify_system

    Use this as the first step when you hold a concrete AI system and need to know which routes of the EU AI Act come into view: prohibited practice screening, Annex III high risk, transparency, FRIA and the general purpose model route, and…

  • get_applicable_obligations

    Use this when you need the obligations themselves for one assessed system rather than the classification picture: which obligations apply, which possibly apply, from when, why, and on which source and locator. Returns one entry per…

  • explain_applicability

    Use this whenever you have to justify why an obligation does or does not bear on a case, and an outcome on its own is not enough. It returns the legal path: the conditions under which the rule is about a situation, the exceptions under…

  • get_source_provenance

    Use this before you quote, cite or hand on anything from this graph, and whenever a reader asks on what authority a statement rests. It returns, for one object, every statement with its kind, its primary source, the locator inside that…

  • get_national_enforcement

    Use this for the national layer: which authority is designated in a member state, how far the implementing law has come, and which dated enforcement signals are recorded, each with a primary source. The authority is recorded as free text…

  • check_case

    Use this when the user describes a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data (a system, a project, a supplier) and wants to know whether a DPIA, a FRIA or duties under the GDPR (AVG) and the EU AI Act come into play. It runs the…

  • export_dpia_intake

    Use this when the user wants the DPIA intake of a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data as a Word file to work on, and, where the FRIA comes into play, the FRIA draft too. It takes the same fixed fact answers as the case check…

  • answer_question

    Use this for a short, general question about the EU AI Act or the GDPR (AVG), such as whether a customer service chatbot has to say that it is AI or when a DPIA is required. It looks the question up in the published Praxikon answers…

  • request_expert_review

    Use this only when the user asks for it in their own words: they want to talk to a person, ask for a human expert, or ask how to get in touch about their situation. Never call it on your own initiative, never as a closing suggestion, and…

How to connect

Add the server to your MCP client config. Claude Desktop, Cursor and most other clients read this shape:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "praxikon": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

Add it

Claude Code, in a terminal

claude mcp add --transport http praxikon https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp

Add to CursorAdd to VS Code

claude.ai, ChatGPT and other clients: add https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp as a custom connector in the settings.

Each line is something a program found when it went looking: the registry entry, the server's own answer, a spec that parses. A missing line means we did not find it, not that it does not exist.